• Geodad@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The evidence should convince people.

    Scientists are failing to adequately communicate with the public.

    • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is only so much “dumbing down” you can do to scientific research about topics until you lose all contextual nuance or become too long winded for a layperson to understand without being overloaded with information.

      Then there is the issue with secondary and tertiary sources using simple language that causes confusion because it lacks the contextual nuance necessary to convey the correct interpretation.

    • Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. There’s definitely a gap in how conclusions are communicated to the public.

      It’s crazy to me that so much of the general public don’t understand that science is just a protocol of observing, recording, testing, and analyzing results.

      • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, mostly not the scientists’ fault but the media sensationalizing the data in secondary and tertiary sources.

        And, as you said, general ignorance of how science works internally. That is a problem with education though, again not the fault of the scientists.

      • Geodad@lemmy.worlddeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then said public should not reap the benefits of scientific research.

        Ship them off to an island and let them live without science.