• OCATMBBL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m here trying to figure out if you mean that the train is powered by suffering and coal, or if you mean the train is suffering, and it is powered by coal.

      I’m probably focusing on the wrong thing, but it feels important.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

    So hopefully they improve the transit situation in the cities & surrounding areas as well.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

      We can’t build mass transit because then we might need to build more mass transit.

      Also, it would be entirely impossible to expand local mass transit after the intrastate rail broke ground but before it was finished. Couldn’t be done. But we somehow can completely rewire I-45 to facilitate more interstate trucking.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, I knew the feds had cancelled grant money to it, I didn’t know the state killed it. I know they’re all in the pocket of big oil, but it’s just wild to me how trains are apparently woke.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      At least in Houston, the transit isn’t horrible if you stay in the inner loop. They gave a few rail lines and the buses run frequently there, so it’s probably fine in theory. But if you have to leave the inner core…

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, you’ve got to start somewhere. CAHSR has been the impetus for a lot of sprawled out central valley cities to get their shit together. Fresno is probably the prime example of this. We’re trying to drag Merced into getting its shit together, though kicking and screaming it may be.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Displacing minorities is a feature. Otherwise Those People might build up generational wealth, and eventually start considering themselves white people’s equals. POSIWID.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      TIL a new acronym, but one doesn’t need to infer the purpose of the system from what it does. The designers of the system said out loud that segregation was a feature. They gave speeches and wrote memos about it.

  • FundMECFS@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    (Seriously tho those wide urban highways split up a city as much as a river does. It looks like the Hudson in NYC with those massive bridges).

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Steal land. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. Steal it again. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. If anyone complains, tell them that you shouldn’t care about the latest set of owners because they bought it off you when you stole it from the last set of owners.

      Don’t ask who profits. It’s definitely not six families who showed up wealthy and have only ever been getting richer for the last century.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it was a new interstate or an extra lane on the Katy freeway, nobody would be saying shit. My favorite example is how there’s in interstate project in the northeast that’s pretty much as overbudget as CAHSR and basically nobody is talking shit about it.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know that that’s an “average Texan,” I think that’s more “average massively wealthy landholding Texan.”

    • FundMECFS@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Certainly is average Texan voter. They vote for this.

      (Although they’ve mostly been indoctrinated from a young age so the blame is more on the corpocratic state elite than the population).