• batcheck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This does not look real. I can’t put my finger as to why. It looks like good CGI but the lighting off the robot does not feel perfect.

    • multiplewolves@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was curious why someone downvoted you, so I took a look at the video.

      That is absolutely 100% CGI and I’m not sure why anyone is doubting that. I’m on mobile and I can still see it.

      Take my upvote.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The biggest tell is at 0:21.

        You see the badge flying around as a physics object and then, when the animation stops the left side part of the necklace “resets” and slides up on the bots neck despite that being like a ball suddenly deciding to go from a rest to rolling up hill.

        It looks like it went from being rendered as a physics object to slowing down enough that it returned to being a regular object attached to the model’s rigging .

        • multiplewolves@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The badge, the soft landings, and the seams in the concrete blipping in and out were the biggest factors for me.

          Edit for downvoter: Watch nothing but the concrete for the whole video. I think the badge moved too perfectly and the landings didn’t seem to reflect physics, but the jitter on the concrete rendering is beyond unrealistic.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let‘s give them the benefit of doubt. I mean this would only be the millionth time they get caught blatantly faking footage of exactly this technology and make wrong claims. Surely they have learned by now. /s