• AquaOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It don’t see anything wrong with that paragraph. Anything to attack the author by accusing them of being ai.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are talking about the breed, not the sex. So they hatch 10 chicks some will be male and they aren’t good meat chickens (male) but they keep the layers (female)

          • BCsven@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Again you missed the point. When they breed the chicken line for good layers, not all hatch as females, so because the males are useless they toss them in the grinder. As compared to chickens bred for consumption, that lineage has larger meatier males for eating. That was the whole topic point you had trouble with in the paragraph.

            It only recently mutated to cows and humans, before it was limited to birds.

              • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 month ago

                You are missing the fundamental part , when they say chickens bred to lay eggs, they don’t mean for female chieckens only, because you can’t just hatch females.

                They have a breed line of chicken (I.e. like you have dog breeds , for example a chihuahua) So males also hatch too. And if you have ever seen a hatchery assembly line, it is a conveyor belt of fluffy chicks, the staff check each chick and toss the males into a grinder. They never make it to grown rooster, because they consider it a waste of resources to raise a bird that is not rotund as an eater.

                So the original paragraph is correct, chickens bred to lay eggs, have the roosters killed. For your logic you are insisting on the sentence should have said Hens bred to lay eggs, which would then invalidate the second part.

          • lefaucet@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            If you don’t see chickens as sentient, why would you feed and house 100 roosters you can’t sell when 1 would do the job required to continue the egg-laying population?

      • 0ops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Again, chickens bred to lay eggs are not male.

        Til that leghorns reproduce asexually.

      • crank0271@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        They’re talking about those breeds of chickens that are “layers” (vs. “broilers”)

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think the misunderstanding where it says ‘bred to’

        By this, they are referring to artificial genetic selection, which you can read more about here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_breeding

        Say we have some species of plant, which makes fruits. If we want fruits that are large, we can take the seeds from the plants that make large fruits and plant them, while discarding the seeds from plants that have small fruits. Over time, we will get larger and larger fruits. However, the fruits might also change in other ways as a result, such as by having a lighter colour or being less sweet.

        In this case, they are selecting for characteristics that make a chicken better at laying eggs. Over time, some chickens are better at laying eggs. However, those chickens don’t “produce very high-quality meat”