• november
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    Oh, well, if others are worse then I guess you’re not doing anything wrong.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you’ve got to lose weight, you cut out the fat, not the muscle.

      If you care about the environment, target the worst, least necessary things first. You don’t genuinely care about the environment though.

      • november
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        You got me, I don’t give a shit about the environment, unlike you, the biggest tree-hugger in the world.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You will if we manage to trigger another mass extinction due to dying seas and you choke to death on clouds of hydrogen sulfide. Or you will care about the environment as you starve to death after our global breadbaskets collapse due to skyrocketing temperatures. We already have WW2-level casualties locked in due to climate by the end of the century. Our efforts right now are trying to keep them merely to WW2-levels, rather than “global nuclear war” levels.

          You do not live independent of this planet’s biosphere. You are an animal that exists atop a vast pyramid of life below you, and you are completely and utterly dependent on the services of life below you provides. You are like a CEO saying, “I don’t care what happens to the people I employ. If they die, I’ll be fine.”

          Ignorant. Suicidal. Hubris.