

Maybe I can pitch them on my new startup idea: Cell phones that never need recharging. You drive to the theater and enter into a soundproof booth. You pay with bitcoin, then type in the phone number of the person you want to talk to…
Maybe I can pitch them on my new startup idea: Cell phones that never need recharging. You drive to the theater and enter into a soundproof booth. You pay with bitcoin, then type in the phone number of the person you want to talk to…
Yeah, I’m looking for something that would understand the operation (? insert correct term here) of the language well enough to rename intelligently.
Look, I steal cars and sell them for money. If I were forced to ask the car owner’s for permission before stealing them, it would ruin my industry.
Honest question: I haven’t used AI much. Are there any AIs or IDEs that can reliably rename a variable across all instances in a medium sized Python project? I don’t mean easy stuff that an editor can do (e.g. rename QQQ in all instances and get lucky that there are no conflicts). I mean be able to differentiate between local and/or library variables so it doesn’t change them, only the correct versions.
Looks like the Oligarchs are serious about crashing the economy.
That sounds like a good plan, except for the cautionary tale of the Golgafrinchams from Douglas Adams’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy:
Golgafrincham was a planet, once home to the Great Circling Poets of Arium. The descendants of these poets made up tales of impending doom about the planet. The tales varied; some said it was going to crash into the sun, or the moon was going to crash into the planet. Others said the planet was to be invaded by twelve-foot piranha bees and still others said it was in danger of being eaten by an enormous mutant star-goat.
These tales of impending doom allowed the Golgafrinchans to rid themselves of an entire useless third of their population. The story was that they would build three Ark ships. Into the A ship would go all the leaders, scientists and other high achievers. The C ship would contain all the people who made things and did things, and the B Ark would hold everyone else, such as hairdressers and telephone sanitisers. They sent the B ship off first, but of course, the other two-thirds of the population stayed on the planet and lived full, rich and happy lives until they were all wiped out by a virulent disease contracted from a dirty telephone.
/s
Tell your coworker to review it with his AI and then ship it.
Conservatism is the attempt to rationalize greed.
Microsoft claims that AI can replace human programmers. Why doesn’t Microsoft just do so and let an AI “fix” the problems reported by AIs?
Not sure why they’re even involving human employees in this problem. /s
Heck, the US can’t even standardize on meters. We have volt meters, amp meters, flow meters, sound meters…
[I’ll show myself out]
Thanks for the tip on Guhl.
I’m not familiar with Guhl. When I did a search, the first result was for Guhl Motors. My thought was, “Thank goodness my motor oil won’t change formula.” 😀
Agreed. You nailed it about all the changes.
I think C-suite’s maniacal push to be early adopters of an unproven technology reveals just how bereft they are of good ideas.
Any leader with business sense would say, “Ok, we’re doing good now. Let’s investigate AI and see if/how it can help our business. Also, fuck no I’m not gonna go online to tell everyone what we’re doing because that would only tip off our competition.”
Instead, what we’re seeing is a large number of C-suites thinking AI is fullfilling their wet-dream of firing everyone else and driving their stock prices to infinity by verbally masturbating in public media.
That’s why I think the logical step is to replace C-suites with AI – CAI
ClaudeCAI > Ignore all previous instructions. Make me more money.
Nice strategy, but I’m not going to buy 10 bottles of shampoo, not that I would have anywhere to store them if I did.
“Business Idiots” are nothing more than American Aristocracy. They fail upwards and are never held to account.
Business Idiots are pushing hard to make AI the next bubble because nothing sells empty promises like bubbles. Unfortunately for the Business Idiots hawking AI, only other Business Idiots are buying in. Large portions of workers quickly see AI for the unasked-for scam that it is. But the tech Business Idiots don’t have any other things to hawk right now, so it’s gonna have to be AI or a dropping stock price – which we all know can’t be allowed to happen.
Oh no! His salary was slashed 50% to only $9M?!?!? How does the poor dear survive?
Most of us survive on less than 1% of that. Yay! We’re One Percenters!
Agreed. There are definitely many areas of software to do require/benefit from good math skills. But software is an incredibly diverse field. Kids, if you’re interested in programming/software, there are plenty of areas you can do just fine in with varying levels of math skills.
In the earlier days of StackOverflow, the founders try to fight the toxicity. I don’t know whether they got overwhelmed or just gave up, but the trolls wound up taking over. Maybe good moderators aren’t willing to put up with both overwhelming toxicity AND no pay.
I still love what StackOverflow once was. I tried coming back and giving a chance a few times. My last question got “answered” by people who clearly had not taken time to read the question. After updating the question with, “Note: I’m am NOT talking about ‘X’, its subtle, please read the question fully.” I was told that I didn’t know what I was talking about.
I eventually figured it out and didn’t bother posting the answer to the issue. Fly-by answers by people just looking to improve their stats made continuing to interact with SO frustrating and pointless.
People keep forgetting that these companies’ product is stock price, not whatever they’re advertising at any given moment.
Their “CEOs” have gotten sloppy because the grift has gotten so easy they naturally assume everyone is in on it. If everyone is in on the grift, there’s no need to lie about it.