• 63 Posts
  • 421 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 10th, 2024

help-circle
  • The misinformation is directing people to report election interference using phone numbers belonging to a political organization, rather than the election authorities. A call to those numbers is not a call to the authorities. The post directs people away from the appropriate channels. It is therefore misleading.

    [Edit: I acknowledge that it might have been well-intended. It is still misleading.]

    the image clearly states who is behind it.

    The presence of a domain name printed at the bottom of the list of phone numbers, which most people will not carefully consider (or in many cases even notice), doesn’t make it okay.

    you came at it as “lies”

    I said no such thing. Please don’t put words in my mouth.


  • Of course, if there is immediate danger, calling someone who can show up and help right away is always a good idea. (I wouldn’t think this needs stating, but yes, I agree on this point.)

    None of the resources detailed in this post provide any form of immediate assistance to resolve an ongoing threat to your ability to cast your vote.

    The local election offices are not substitutes for police departments, but I think they are likely to respond quickly. They have phone numbers.

    If your ballot is never cast, it can’t be fixed later. The best the folks in the OP can do is punish the people who committed the crime. They can’t get your vote counted.

    This is untrue. It is better to get your vote recorded the first time, of course, but fixing things later is also possible. If regional authorities are made aware of election interference, they can initiate a re-count, refuse to certify the results until a new vote is taken, etc. That’s part of their job.


  • I agree, but every avenue at our disposal are forms.

    This is untrue. A phone number is prominently shown on the very first official link I tried: the Public Integrity Section of the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division. There are more phone numbers at the various state election offices.

    You assuming that because they are a political org, they will play partisan politics,

    No. I have assumed no such thing. I am pointing out that they are not the authorities, and since they are not, a report to them is not a report to the authorities. They might play partisan politics, or they might not. They might remember to pass your report on to the authorities at some point in the future, or they might forget. There’s no way to know, and it doesn’t matter.

    Report directly to the authorities. It’s fine to also report to someone else, but they are no substitute. Definitely report to the authorities.


  • You called a political organization, and reached someone who is trained to tell you the sort of thing you wanted to hear.

    The election authorities need to know about vote interference immediately. If you witness it, call the authorities directly.

    It’s possible that the political org you called might be helpful as an extra measure, if you have additional free time to contact them as well. It’s also possible that they will reassure you and promptly drop your report in the proverbial trash if the interference you reported aligns with their interests. It’s impossible to know, no matter what they say. Either way, they are no substitute for calling the authorities.







  • That symlink approach is one way to run the game executable directly, but it’s a little heavy handed, and likely to be reverted whenever the game gets updates or you verify the game files.

    Sometimes you can put something like /path/to/game/executable.exe %command% in the Steam launch options to accomplish the same thing without symlinks. I suggest reading more of those comments to see if anyone had success with this approach.

    It might still be a good idea to replace exFAT, though. Symlinks are often useful. :)



  • I don’t know if --skip-launcher is a valid command line option. If it is, I expect it just tells the launcher to immediately launch the game without showing a launcher screen. Of course, if the launcher requires a version of .Net that isn’t set up correctly, then it can’t run at all, and therefore can’t even get as far as noticing the command line option (let alone run the game). So I wouldn’t expect this to work.

    Instead, read through the bug report that I linked earlier. Look for the comments that explain how to make Steam run bg3_dx11.exe or bg3.exe instead of running the launcher at all. (I don’t remember the exact paths, so I can’t just write the correct command line here.)

    (Note: GitHub often hides some comments until you click the link to reveal more of them, so just using Control+F in your browser might not find these comments until you’ve clicked it several times.)



  • AFAIK, RetroArch is just a front-end for the emulators that actually use the controller, so getting this to work depends on the emulator you’ll be using.

    I would expect any decent emulator on Linux to work with the standard Linux joystick and/or evdev APIs, which are supported by the Linux DualShock 4 driver. This driver is built in to the Linux kernel; nothing more should require installation. However:

    It’s possible that your distro might not load that driver automatically. To check, connect the DS4, power it up with the Playstation button (if its light isn’t already on), and run lsmod |grep -E 'hid_sony|hid_playstation' in a terminal. If it responds with some lines containing hid_sony or hid_playstation, then the driver is loaded.

    It’s possible that your distro might not have labeled the DS4 as a joystick device in udev, which isn’t strictly required, but some software expects to see. On the distros I’ve used, the easiest way to get this done is to install the steam-devices package. I think most desktop distros do it automatically these days, though.

    You don’t want DS4Windows. That’s Windows software. There is a program (not a driver) called ds4linux, which creates a virtual Xbox controller alongside the real DS4, similar to what Steam Input does when you use it. You shouldn’t need this for games/emulators that were written properly for Linux, but it’s there for cases when a developer took a shortcut and assumed Microsoft game hardware is standard on our non-Microsoft OS. Alternatively, I think you can use Steam Input when launching non-Steam games in Steam.

    There are various joystick test programs for linux, to give you an idea of whether the OS sees the controller. (This can be helpful when a game doesn’t appear to see it, to determine if it’s the game’s problem or a connection/driver problem.) KDE Plasma has one built in to the System Settings. There’s a also generic one called jstest-gtk, available with most desktop distros. There are probably more out there.

    Keep in mind that test programs like that don’t necessarily know which inputs map to which buttons/sticks on the controller. Don’t panic if they look mixed up in a test program; try it in a game first. If they’re still mixed up, look for a way to remap the inputs.




  • Cloudflare has a long track record of not abusing that position, though.

    Well, Cloudflare is not all that old, and we can’t see what they do with our data, so I would say it has a medium-length record of not getting caught abusing that position. But that’s not the point.

    The point is that most Lemmy users’ actual browsing is in fact not private between them and their server. Many instances have a big network service corporation like Cloudflare watching everything read or written by every user, so that info is available to anyone with sufficient access or influence there, like employees and governments.

    That applies to most of the internet,

    Not exactly, but it does apply to a great many of the biggest web sites, so we could say it applies to much of the internet’s traffic.

    And that’s part of the problem. Cloudflare is in a position to watch much of what people do on the web, across many unrelated sites and services (often including domain name lookups), and trivially identify them. This includes whatever political, religious, or NSFW posts they’re reading on Lemmy, and who they are when they log in to their bank accounts.

    In any case, I replied not to be pedantic, but just to let our community know that they shouldn’t assume their reading habits on Lemmy are safely anonymized behind a made-up username, or confidential between them and their instance admins. If your instance uses a provider of DDOS protection or HTTPS acceleration, as many big instances do, then the walls have ears.