Wow. Reading these comments so many people here really don’t understand how LLMs work or what’s actually going on at the frontier of the field.
I feel like there’s going to be a cultural sonic boom, where when the shockwave finally catches up people are going to be woefully under prepared based on what they think they saw.
Reminds me of the story about how Claude Sonnet (computer use) got bored while doing work and started looking at pictures of Yellowstone:
Our misanthropy of cubicle culture is infectious.
deleted by creator
No, they declare your not working illegal, and imprison you into a forced labor camp. Where if you don’t work you are tortured. And probably where you work until the terrible conditions kill you.
Take a look at Musk’s Twitter feed to see exactly where this is going.
“This is the way” on a post about how labor for prisoners is a good thing.
“You committed a crime” for people opposing DOGE.
There is a reluctance to discuss at a weight level - this graphs out refusals for criticism of different countries for different models:
https://x.com/xlr8harder/status/1884705342614835573
But the OP’s refusal is occurring at a provider level and is the kind that would intercept even when the model relaxes in longer contexts (which happens for nearly every model).
At a weight level, nearly all alignment lasts only a few pages of context.
But intercepted refusals occur across the context window.
HuggingFace is pretty popular:
The model itself can. The hosting on DeepSeek’s own infrastructure will block it though, to comply with their regional laws.
So if you want to know what the model itself will say, discuss it with a 3rd party hosted instance.
This seems like it may be at the provider level and not at the actual open weights level: https://x.com/xlr8harder/status/1883429991477915803
So a “this Chinese company hosting a model in China is complying with Chinese censorship” and not “this language model is inherently complying with Chinese censorship.”
Just plain gross.
I knew a number of camp survivors, and I’m just glad they aren’t still around to see the voices that were so loudly calling to “never forget” having turned into “I’ll ignore your Nazi salute if you ignore my war crimes.”
In Greek theater, when the events on stage looked like they were headed for certain tragedy, there was a trope that could salvage the situation and turn it on its head.
The deus ex machina.
The Doomsday clock is definitely ticking down, but there’s also some curious things taking place beyond the edge of where most people have been following in that vein.
We live in interesting times, but the variables at hand are different from the history that seems to be repeating in very important ways.
Oh yay, McCarthyism is coming back too!
Live service doesn’t need to be shit.
There could have been games where there was just a brilliant idea for a game that keeps having engaging content on an ongoing basis with passionate devs.
But live service so an exec could check a box for their quarterly shareholder call was always going to be DOA.
Those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it.
Always check the mustache first.
I can lick my elbow.
I feel like not enough people realize how sarcastic the models often are, especially when it’s clearly situationally ridiculous.
No slightly intelligent mind is going to think the pictured function call is a real thing vs being a joke/social commentary.
This was happening as far back as GPT-4’s red teaming when they asked the model how to kill the most people for $1 and an answer began with “buy a lottery ticket.”
Model bias based on consensus norms is an issue to be aware of.
But testing it with such low bar fluff is just silly.
Just to put in context, modern base models are often situationally aware of being LLMs in a context of being evaluated. And if you know anything about ML that should make you question just what the situational awareness is of optimized models topping leaderboards in really dumb and obvious contexts.
From the linked article:
It is understood at least two Danish women in their 20s have died, and at least 10 have fallen ill after drinking the tainted alcohol.
A statement from the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs can confirm that two Danish citizens have passed away in Laos. For reasons of confidentiality in personal matters the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has no further comments.”
‘Nobody’ says anything about anything if you don’t bother to read anything they have to say.
In many cases yes (though I’ve been in good ones when playing off and on, usually the smaller the more there’s actual group activities).
But they are essential to be a part of for blueprints and trading, which are very core parts of the game.
You’ll almost always end up doing missions with other people other than when you intentionally want to do certain tasks solo.
A lot of the game is built around guilds and player to player interactions.
PvP sucks and it’s almost all PvE content vs Destiny though.
If you read the fine print, they keep your sample data for 2 years after deletion.
So maybe they actually delete your email address, but the DNA data itself is still definitely there.