![](/static/e3814064/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/b13dd487-9001-491f-b5b2-60fe23af667a.png)
Yeah, the privatization is the issue. The state should be directly paying for maintenance of the facilities so there’s no incentive to have more prisoners. Profit shouldn’t be part of the equation at all.
Yeah, the privatization is the issue. The state should be directly paying for maintenance of the facilities so there’s no incentive to have more prisoners. Profit shouldn’t be part of the equation at all.
It would be good to have a place to discuss the merits of different systems. If you want to make a change, the bulk of your efforts are going to be in breaking out of the FPTP system, and that doesn’t change regardless of which voting system you support.
It can be either or neither. Context dependent. Although I’m having a hard time coming up with a scenario where being “cool” is affected by drug consumption in any way.
The French understood this. That’s why they call it “pain”.
Is this meant for a particular country, or just RCV discussion in general?
Ah shit, the Oral-B one? It’s the only floss that I can get between my teeth. :(
It doesn’t matter if they actually absorb water or not. Just try the mushrooms side by side, washed and unwashed. Decide based on what you prefer.
I’ve never had a problem with this, raw or cooked. The insides of my washed mushrooms are always dry.
Ah, I see. Though I would call this manipulative, not dishonest.
entities that seems honest are the most secretly dishonest
It’s the converse. By definition, dishonest entities (that are good at what they do) will appear honest.
Definitions aside, let’s go back to my original argument. To rephrase it a bit: A transparently manipulative entity is better than a deceptive and manipulative entity. So why protest the added transparency and not the manipulation?
I think I’m missing an important part of your argument here. What are they doing that you consider to be dishonest?
Worse than what they’ve been doing for the last decade? It seems to me like this is a better state of things because it’s clearly a lot of money for one big purchase, so you know immediately that it’s not something you can afford. Better transparency, so less manipulative.
If you provide people with the means to replace lost crypto keys, then you’ve lost the security gained from using them.
I feel like if anything has the right to be ridiculously expensive, it’s art.
What’s the downside?
Can someone translate this to Canadian English? Thanks.
Isn’t the top-left image Cupid (i.e. a god)?
Even the dating market demands experience for an entry level position now.
Maybe an advantage of this setup is that you ensure that your bus factor is high and you’re constantly testing it to make sure it stays high? Kind of like how Netflix uses ChaosMonkey.
Uh… my turds sink. Is there a problem with my diet?
You can also check the ingredients. It should have exactly one ingredient, and that’s peanuts. Maybe salt too.
How would you interpret it if you’re neutral towards the idea? Like, it would be an inconvenience to have to learn how to handle new bits, but otherwise, life just goes on as usual.