Vegemite, so good, it’s even wanted by the bad.

I think Nike hot a boost in sales when people found out in the 80s it was a brand favoured by burglars. So it must be soft and fast.

Or its malicious compliance.

If this doesn’t get released, it becomes a bigger deal. Trying to pocket veto this would backfire.

I don’t think it’s the fact that she stuck by Bill. I think it’s the way she did it. She stuck by him and pretended that the women who had previously accused him we’re non existent and it was all Lewinskys fault. I think there was something about her not being Tammy Lynnette just standing by here man, but they were a team. However they were never together and all reports were that she despised him behind the scenes. It was seen as trying to pretend to be someone she is not, purely for power.

You could even argue that it ruined Hilary Clinton’s presidency before it even started. Many turned against her when she decided to stick by Bill, in what was seen as a political act of convenience, that she tried to frame as duty and forgiveness.

Phew. Glad it popped and everyone got it out of their system.

He would win. But he would get much less.

Yes. In the scheme of things, the subsidies seem miniscule compared to eunand USA subsidies over time.

Worst case, they put their western rivals in an unprofitable position thanks to state subsidy. Best casez they turn a profit thanks to the subsidy.

What I would like the euntonso is require.all.parts and tech in the ev market to be open source. Make it a commodity. Then if china subsidised, it’s to the benefit of the consumer. People worry about china dominance in the market. That only works for a closed market.

Require universal charging standards, universal software standards, universal battery storage standards etc and it’s a commodity.

I hope this drives more young voters away from them. Some young voters are returning to the right in the USA, uk etc, more so than millennials who skew more left.

Gosh. I thought smee was mediocre. Boy kavalier and nibs were grating, but nibs does the crazy under surface excellently, to be fair. Timothy Olyphant was great and understated but underutilized. Brother was dull and superfluous. He’s great in other stuff. I think it’s more the part and plot than acting ability.

Don’t forget the gravy if you can’t get coleslaw.

Yes, but usually poorer drama. Misconceptions and misunderstanding happens in real life. When it feels contrived,.it loses impact. Good writing can overcome it but some of the writing seemed like characters making poor choices, not because of any misunderstanding but rather the misunderstanding was created to make a motive.

So far, it’s a good series with the potential to be great. Hawley can make that happen but there are still some current shortcomings. I like the direction they have taken and the themes.

The acting is for the most part good, but sometimes it’s a bit twee with adults pretending to be children in humanoid bodies. The plot is a little disjointed and there are multiple times where characters having a frank discussion would have led to a different path for everyone.

I wonder if the xenomorphs are on screen too much and sonlose their impact. Interesting to have a bunch of other unrelated creatures. We’ll see how that develops.

The passkey is only passed on with an unlocked device. So, if someone stole your passkey device, they can’t copy it and use it without unlocking.

Or rather, making security convenient leads to adoption. Making it inconvenient leads to insecure workarounds.

Yes, but caving will still continue the decline. There is nothing to gain unless they make a deal with something to gain.

Like ACA.

Maybe believing they are passionate in their hatred is what allows us to,sleep at night. If they are blasé about it, then maybe anyone can be hitler.

They have thin margine but very high turnover. It’s not a business plan based on holding stock. The shelf space turns over multiple times per week. They may pay suppliers 30 days after selling to a consumer.

Yes, but usually they rebound after in the asset rise and inflation. However, this book looks less like it’s credit based. It seems to be built on companies lending to each other rather than in the banking system.

I still think the poor will suffer most, but with other drops the richest have ended up richer in real terms and in percent of assets held. I don’t think that will be true this time.

Yes, typically. But in this case, it seems to be the wealthy investing each other’s money rather than people’s houses.

A recession will still hurt everyone and particularly the poor, but the rich mat be less shielded this time around.