- 44 Posts
- 2.4K Comments
That’s note even my point, dumbass. 😂
You never clearly stated your goddamn point, troll.
What’s racist is having a problem with beauty standards from cultures of PoC, while accepting european beauty standards.
The timestamp is 2m05s. Look it up.
So, what’s your point exactly? That people with broad hips aren’t supposed to be shown? What exactly is your point about the “body image”? You still failed to give a concise answer.
Literally pulling shit out of your ass.
That sure is a way not to respond in an argument. I interpret that as you giving up.
I can, and that’s precisely why I find it problematic. I’m not sure you understand, though, by the looks of the shit you’re saying.
Sure. And I can do one handed pull-ups. I just don’t want to. /s
one is eagle spread on a surfboard and the other is checking out her ass.
What? She is sitting on a surfboard. How else is she supposed to sit. Have you ever been on a surfboard? And the one shot where she’s “checking out her ass” has no sexual connotations. It was cooldown of a tense action scene and shows her being self-conscious about her weight. You probably never watched the movie. So don’t just state shit you know nothing about.
Case in point.
Was your point that you’re asking creepy questions? Because then I agree. Otherwise, I restate that it’s not shameful for (pre-)teens to explore their sexuality at their own pace.
Teenage start at thirTEEN. 12 is the upper bound
Oh, yeah. Really big difference, Herr Obersturmbandführer of the sematics nazis. /s
but I’ve been repeatedly referring to 9 year-olds.
So, are you implying that broad hips spoil the youth into being sexually more active at an earlier age? Helen Lovejoy much?
You’re so disingenuous and throwing shit at the wall.
Nah, you’re just body shaming and/or a puritan Helen Lovejoy.
Do you mean the African fertility statues with disproportionate body parts? I hope you realize how that only solidifies my point.
Tell me: what’s the canonical age that it’s ok for people find out that big butts exist and that is an acceptable beauty standard? You’re kind of coming across a bit racist-y here, if you apparently don’t have a problem with white standards of eroticisation and suddenly have a problem if the beauty standards are those of PoC.
Is that a joke? Gaston is a strong man. What part of his design is specifically sexy and revealing? His forearms?
… i literally scrobbled to the line “literally everything covered with hair” and you don’t get the innuendo? Disney announces their first (almost) openly gay character for the third time and it’s how that other guy who’s swooning for Gaston every minute.
Do you see the three women? Gaston. Fucks.
Can’t comment on anything about what you find attractive, but you do you, man!
But just cause you don’t find it attractive, doesn’t mean it’s not there. Don’t come complaining to me, if you’re underserved, homie. I ain’t the problem.
What do you mean? Can you not follow? Keep up.
Before that, I was not starting a logical argument. What “logic” have I introduced that you’re referencing. You’re inventing strawmen. If not: what “logic” are you referencing.
I’m saying this site already has a high sensitivity around sexuality involving children for me to have to explain why this is problematic as a kids show AND movies because I did grow up watching Stitch.
Let’s just pretend that this supposed “sensitivity” you’re talking about didn’t exist: Could you actually explain this supposed "problematic"ness? Because I sure don’t get it. What kinds of horrors has watching Lilo and Stitch corrupted in your precious little child’s mind?
Not one real person gets objectified here. They’re not doing anything erotic, they’re just… there. Where’s the problem? Should they be wearing Nun-outfits? Sexy Nuns, even maybe?
You all seem to be defending this because you found it sexually arousing at 12 and can’t see past that.
If that actually were the case: Why would that have been a problem for me? What should it bother you how I’ve lived through my sexual development?
Also: You do know that a twelve year old has enough people their age where they can watch the whatever teenagers find hot these days? (I would guess thick hips never go out of style)
Don’t insult their intelligence.
Umm… ok, so I should not insult it when it’s about them being oblivious to things that aren’t part of their daily live. But insulting the minor’s mind is ok if it’s about their precious little minds being corrupted by impure thoughts of “thiccc hips 🍑”? /s Grow up.
Who is talking about teenagers?
You brought up 12 year olds, now I can’t say “teenager”? O.o
Quite the contrary, I’m all for teaching children HEALTHY ways of looking at bodies and sexuality. And this ain’t it. You just don’t get my point.
That kind of sounds like good, old body-shaming to me, buddy.
What do you mean “disproportionate” and "solely meant to evoke sexual interest in grown men? People with thick hips exist. And depicting women with (exaggerated) thick hips is several thousands of years old.
Would you also call the designs of Aurora, Belle and any other disney princess as being designed to “solely […] evoke sexual interest in grown men”? Those characters could also be described as out of the norm.
And if we’re going to play the it’s-ok game, where are the sexy men, then?
That’s right. There’s absouletly no oversexualized man in animation. /s
Do you not see anything wrong with this imbalance even by your own logic?
What are you even talking about? What do you mean with “my own logic”?
But besides all this, for all the pedophile pearl clutching done around here
And what do you mean by that? Are you seriously insinuating that people overreact over fucking Epstein? O.o
you seem perfectly fine with turning on 12 year-old children.
These are movies. No one is sexually harrassing children. And children that have no interest/concept of sex don’t notice any sexual innuendo (and these body types aren’t even sexual innuendo).
And for teenagers developing their sexual inner-workings: these teenagers will get sexually aroused from anything. I’m glad that “unhealthily skinny” isn’t the only body type these kids see. And movies are a safe way of exploring these feelings. Without anybody being harrassed.
You spread “no sex-ed books for children” energy, homie.
Edit: Now I found the right words for it: Your urge to shield teenagers from any depiction that’s remotely erotic in nature (very remotely) is downright puritan. And I think that’s weird from someone who’s close to talking pedophile apologia ("pedophile pearl clutching ").
And what supposed “messaging” do you mean, exactly?
Kids famously hate everything involving butts. /s
I hate this little fucker. It’s so obvious that it’s the culmination of the Disney marketing machine. Such obvious manipulation to sell a mediocre product, that I don’t get how people can seriously like this!?
Also: Disney sees Grogu probably as more of a success than Andor, because the merch sells better. Or have you seen kids with Mini-Luthens?
Don’t forget the tradition of revolutionary country music!
Miss me with that slop
Looks like slop (position of the night stand is in the middle of the bed)
8·8 days agoSomething something I’m into that shit!
2·10 days agoI can’t write accents on my keyboard and couldn’t be bothered to switch.
Appelle-moi englishoids encore un fois! J’ai appris francais about 20 years ago je lais toi saivre. /blague
~~Touche!~~Touché!
It’s also an old artstyle with an iphone.
The one from yesterday was slop. This one at least some effort behind it (not much - it’s still a shitpost).