Trailblazing Braille Taser

The American mind cannot comprehend the trolley problem, nor trolleys for that matter

riverSpirit is a time traveler and forgot that Michelle wasn’t elected yet

Ever wonder why you’re getting ads for melatonin?

… was he ok?

Be thankful they didn’t use wingdings

I miss the days when buttons had words on them instead of hieroglyphics.

Time moves differently in Narnia

On the other hand, I’m not sure I’d prefer another “opiate of the masses”.

Surely you’re joking? People do it on YouTube to avoid automated detection. You would be laughed out of court for trying to assert copyright over a reversed video as a derivative work.

This is Deadpool wearing a Spider Man costume

Except everyone writing C is writing sloppy C. It’s like driving a car, there’s always a non-zero chance of an accident.

Even worse, in C the compiler is just waiting for you to trip up so it can do something weird. Think the risk of UB is overblown? I found this article from Raymond Chen enlightening: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20140627-00/?p=633

But wHeRe would the money come from?

I am a weirdo and always get things backwards that the rest of the population has no trouble with.

Righty-tighty, lefty-loosey made no sense when I was a kid because I focused on the bottom of the thing I was spinning instead of the top.

Same with the stove. Wtf is the “front” burner? I mapped the four burners to the four seats of a car in my head, and I thought the front burner would be the ones farther away from me. 🫨

The thing that trips me up, as a dinosaur, is whether “swipe left” refers to the direction your hand moves or the direction that the viewport is traveling. If I scroll by moving my finger to the left, now I’m looking at stuff that was previously on my right.

Even a bullshit knife can cut you.

how those jockstraps are doing

Did you see that ludicrous display last night?

Take a look at all the struct definition. It’s a pure virtual method of 🍽️ with a bunch of overrides in the structs that inherit from 🍽️.

Ok boomer

That’s neat, I’d never heard of it before!

It is an open question whether an Angel of some power k can escape forever.

Looks like you’re quoting the Proceedings of 11th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics from 2005: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2958119.2958180

Apparently, it was solved (twice!) the next year.

In late 2006, the original problem was solved when independent proofs appeared, showing that an angel can win. Bowditch proved that a 4-angel (that is, an angel with power k = 4) can win[2] and Máthé[3] and Kloster[4] gave proofs that a 2-angel can win.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_problem

“Never stop sucking.”

-James Dyson