• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    And the deal with Cthulhu is that he gets to devour whoever you’ve sacrificed, and in return he provides a benefit to the survivors: allowing them to live long enough to provide more sacrifices. It’s basically the same deal.

    Also, if anyone reading this happens to be a seed on a fruit meant to be devoured by humans then I have bad news about your final destination: it’s rather a stinky place that is not in any way conducive to your growth. The cake is a lie.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      It’s basically the same deal

      It’s not even remotely similar.

      Also, that “stinky place” to us is heaven to a plant. Kinda how the foul oxygen they excrete is life-giving air to us.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        The stinky place isn’t soil. It’s a sewer or a landfill, because that’s where human waste ends up. Neither can support plant life because they are devoid of light, just like the realm of Cthulhu.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Doesn’t change the plant-animal arrangement from the perspective of the plant, it’s still freely given. We just hold up our end through agriculture.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              You’re saying that again as if I didn’t just enumerate the several fundamental differences. I get that you made an observation that you like, but it’s not really accurate.

              • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                You just asserted that the fruit is freely given, but you haven’t supported that.

                I mean, one could also say that cows and pigs willingly sacrifice themselves so humans will continue to feed their descendants, but there isn’t any evidence of that either.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  11 days ago

                  Basic botany and critical thinking skills. The difference between fruit bearing plants and animals is that slaughter isn’t an intrinsic part of animal reproduction. If you can present an alternate theory that better explains why angiosperms spend the energy to encase their seeds in stuff that animals find delicious, I’m happy to concede. All the evidence suggests they co-evolved with animals to take advantage of an efficient method of seed dispersal.

                  • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 days ago

                    If you want to make a teleological argument, then you could equally ask why agricultural animals, compared to wild animals, have much higher fat content and other characteristics that humans find delicious.

                    All evidence suggests those features are favored by humans, who are the animals currently responsible for ensuring their continued reproduction.