• CharlieActual@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Old revolvers had the firing in on the hammer and could fire if they were dropped and landed on an uncooked hammer. For most of the past century, however, the firing pin has been separate from the hammer and that kind of drop-fire is impossible.

    I have some bad news for you. https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2018/06/investigates/sig-sauer-p320-drop-fire/

    That model was one of the most popular service pistols - LOADS and LOADS of them out there. That is also not the only model with drop-fire problems… Remington 700s will unintentional discharge as well:

    https://www.gunsamerica.com/digest/remington-fix-triggers-model-700-rifles/

    There are others I cannot recall.

    It’s a problem.

    • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Since these are not revolvers, they don’t add to the point of carrying on an empty cylinder.

      Outside of the revolver discussion, it’s important to note that both of these examples were the result of QA issues that have since been corrected.

        • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Firstly, I don’t have an obsession with revolvers; it’s just that you responded to a conversation specifically about design changes in revolvers that mitigated the need to carry on empty cylinder.

          Secondly, this is another example of a limited QA issue that has since been corrected with a recall. It doesn’t seem to indicate that a modern revolver with properly functioning parts would be dangerous to carry with all cylinders loaded. Otherwise, are you to say all airbags are dangerous just because of the Takata/Honda issue that killed some people when the airbags exploded?