• Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    According to the Linux Foundation: Yes According to Google: No, not really

  • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    You are on this council, but we do not grant you the rank of master.

  • androidisking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was talking to a friend the other about about this. He said he loves the Android OS. He said imagining putting Linux on it and I couldn’t help but laugh. His eyes widened when I told him what Android really was

  • HStone32@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve been patiently waiting for advancements in true Linux phones for years. I feel like a hypocrite when using android. Anyone know if pinephone is nearing a new release?

      • Darorad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Eh, it depends how you define Linux. Android uses a modified Linux kernel, but most of what’s above that is different. By the point you’re at the application layer they’re basically completely incompatible.

        Is it technically Linux? Yeah but it’s so different from a user’s perspective it’s best to treat them as separate imo.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          User land is incompatible even between traditional Linux distros and they all do kernel mods to suit their needs, so yeah, Android is as much of a Linux as Ubuntu is.

          • Darorad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Android introduces far more incompatibilities, and the kernel mods are more impactful than the vast majority of other systems. Userspace incompatibilities are basically negligable for most distros.

            It’s differences are substantial enough that I think it makes sense to treat it as a separate os.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Not true at all. Many distros like Alpine are not using GNU userland, yet you would consider them a proper Linux, right? And kernel changes in distros… Don’t even get me started. Suffice to say that no one ships vanilla for decades.