Democratic vice-presidential candidate calls opponent a ‘slick talker’ in first comments on Tuesday’s televised clash
The day after the only vice-presidential debate this year, Democrat Tim Walz called his Republican challenger, JD Vance, a “slick talker” who was trying to rewrite history and gaslight people about Donald Trump’s record.
During a rally in York, Pennsylvania, Walz made his first public comments on the debate, which polls show was essentially a tie between the two vice-presidential candidates. The Minnesota governor was on a tour through the swing state on Wednesday.
Walz said the two men “had a civil but spirited debate” and that he didn’t underestimate Vance’s debate skills.
But, he added: “You can’t rewrite history and trying to mislead us about Donald Trump’s record. That’s gaslighting. That’s gaslighting, on the economy, reproductive freedom, housing, gun violence.”
🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/
None of my searching shows it to be a clinical term. I think you just made that up.
Here’s what the Cleveland Clinic says:
A “very specific” form of emotional abuse that’s “over-used” to describe lying, but in truth, people uses these tactics to “deteriorate a victim’s morality, sanity and sense-of-self”
Applying this to a debate performance is troubling. He’s just a lying asshole.
That doesn’t make it a clinical term.
In fact:
https://www.sondermind.com/resources/articles-and-content/how-to-deal-with-gaslighting/
If it isn’t in the DSM V, it is not a clinical term in psychology. It is a term for laypeople.
Seems fair.
I will note that both of our sources point out that the term has become overused, which was my fucking point.
We lost a valuable term and now it’s worthless, even as a colloquialism.