- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Let me tell you about a Microsoft AI researcher […] who recently spent quite a lot of time considering whether the legendary Microsoft real time strategy game Age of Empires II is conscious, and built a basic neural network within the video game using digital goats to prove his point. […]
De Wynter built an LLM within AoEII using goats. “The point of the paper is to formally show that we anthropomorphise too readily, and that sometimes the claims we make with regards to LLM capabilities are too strong,” he told 404 Media. “It’s not an easy task, given that ‘human-like attributes’ is a bit of an abstract term.”



Sorry, I don’t follow. I’m talking about the definition of those words.
Not talking about consciousness.
Sentience IS perception of environment.
I don’t know and I’m not saying it is.
Do we not? That’s precisely why it’s important to make that difference. Sentience is relatively easy to define and can be assigned with a lot of confidence whereas sapience isn’t and can’t.
Can you be sentient without first being concious? If not, and I’d argue not, then in speaking of sentience we are also necessarily speaking of conciousness.
Your assertion that sentience is perception of environment is a category error. You’ve mistaken casually identifying sentience in others with sentience itself.
I’ve fetched the definitions for all three terms and quoted them below.
Merriam-Webster
by extension…
Sentience is the capacity of sensing or feeling. That’s an important distinction.
Then I fail to see the point or intention of your first comment. How are your semantics meant to further the discussion or clarify the reader’s thinking?
If sentience here is taken literally to mean “physical sense ability” in the broadest sense then, yeah, sure. That’s not helpful though. It’s too reductive to be relevant to the topic at hand. Within philosophy of mind sentience is often referring to the ability or capacity for feeling (as in experience (joy, grief, etc)). It’s a complex quality of some thinking minds and may well be a spectrum of ability whose boundaries are difficult to define.