• JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Using this low of a contrast (dark red on dark background) is criminal. Maybe my eyes are just that bad but good lord those notes are hard to read

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    News flash: it’s not just ask Reddit. It’s Reddit entirely. That place is a removed of bots.

  • DarkKnight_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    A lot of the site feels like it’s been overrun by bots. The more niche communities seem to still be pretty good (and I do still enjoy engaging in them). But the subs like ask Reddit, Aita and the relationships one? Yea, it all feels like bs.

    • sillyplasm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      If only the niche communities over here were a bit more active. For instance, I’ve been hyperfixating on Tamagotchi, but there isn’t a Tamagotchi community here yet :(

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Two questions:

    1. How can you be sure they’re bots?
    2. Assuming you can be sure (which I entirely doubt), how do you detect and ban them in a way they can’t come back?
    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago
      1. There are patterns of bot-posters, as well as the fact that in many cases the content exists elsewhere online and was copied.
      2. You can’t really. While you can ban individual accounts, they are able to make more, as I’ve said before it’s very easy to evade bans in ways that prevent easy ban evasion detection on Reddit’s part. It’s also likely that if Reddit is doing it they won’t enforce ban evasion against bots, though I find that option less likely.
    • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      We have a bot problem, but we also have admins/ mods that don’t want to bloat their numbers with bots (mostly). The fediverse helps us hold each other accountable, and if any community is full of bots, you defedirate them. I don’t mind the auto posters that seed content. I like the OSRS update bot, etc…

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      01001001 00100111 01101101 00100000 01100001 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01101100 00100000 01101000 01110101 01101101 01100001 01101110

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    the average redditor will still insist on appending “Reddit” onto Google searches since it “lets them see real human opinions” only because they can’t discern obvious botting from genuine human interactions

    • bitwaba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      A lot of the botting is just copy and pasting previous actual human topics and comments though, so they’re not really wrong.

      Actual bot created content is pretty boring, and never “contributes” in a way that would make for a useful Google result. Your Google result may be a bot’s comment, but if that comment is answering a question of some kind there’s a 99% chance the comment was originally written by a human.

      • Morshveeneck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The content of bots (the desired ones) is at least not banned or removed by anyone. For example, I feel socially excluded by the Reddit and para-Reddit communities because whenever I write something a bit more controversial, it immediately ends up in the trash.

      • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        copying and pasting a comment is still less genuine, since that promotes stale and outdated information. It can also create the false idea of a “widely held” opinion rather than a single person’s opinion copied a dozen times.

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      They’re engagement fodder designed to elicit human responses to provide a larger training dataset for future LLMs. That and to drive up Reddit usage and engagement numbers.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Some may have been copied directly from Facebook since most bot posts copy from ones humans have made before.

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If reddit hadn’t locked their API behind absurd paywalls, it would have been a cool project to try to make a browser plugin that gives accounts a “credit score” based on the factors you’ve been looking at, in order to let users quickly judge how likely an account is a bot.

    It could let people adjust the metrics it uses to calculate that score in the settings, so even if it becomes popular enough for bots to start trying to game the system, people can adapt their scoring metrics themselves and share config profiles that they think are more effective at rating bots.

    Might be something cool to see for activitypub/fediverse/lemmy accounts, but with the data available varying by instance it might be a little harder to calibrate a “catch-all” scoring config