Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agophotoshop's trademark rulelemmy.mlimagemessage-square17linkfedilinkarrow-up171file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up171imagephotoshop's trademark rulelemmy.mlArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square17linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square☭SaltyIcetea☭@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up29·1 month agocounterpoint, language evolves over time and if the majority of people decide that these are proper words then so be it
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 month agoThis image was photoshopped with GIMP.
minus-squareRobotFK@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month ago*This image was photoshopped by a GIMP
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoThis why trademarks are not nouns.
minus-squareSoup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoThis is literally about whether the word can be trademarked, not about whether it’s a real word or not. You should not speak on language until you have a basic grasp on how to even read one.
minus-squarewarbond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·1 month agoI thought it was about how Adobe should fuck off
counterpoint, language evolves over time and if the majority of people decide that these are proper words then so be it
This image was photoshopped with GIMP.
*This image was photoshopped by a GIMP
This why trademarks are not nouns.
This is literally about whether the word can be trademarked, not about whether it’s a real word or not. You should not speak on language until you have a basic grasp on how to even read one.
I thought it was about how Adobe should fuck off
Adobe rep, is that you?