Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoEcho Frames Ruleslrpnk.netimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1526
arrow-up1526imageEcho Frames Ruleslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoGot a source on that? I love that this rumor goes around every few months and nicely reminds me which communities are full of terrible media literacy.
minus-squarebaguettefish@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agocox media group “active listening” https://archive.is/pSBzD
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoWhat do you think of the discussion here? Do you still believe the sensational headline? (Also way to prove my point)
minus-squarebaguettefish@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agothe active listening article is very vague and apart from fantasizing about 24/7 surveillance everywhere for everyone it doesn’t say a whole lot directly, so in my mind it’s best to assume the worst case scenario
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIn other words you choose to believe what you want to believe and don’t care about facts. Neat.
minus-squarebaguettefish@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI’ll gladly believe something else if they claim something else, but their claims are very dystopian
minus-squareBrilliantIdiot@gaygeek.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months ago@ayyy https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technology/marketing-firm-admits-using-your-own-phone-to-listen-in-on-your-conversations/ar-AA1pVkQW
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoWhat do you think of the discussion here? Do you still believe the sensational headline? (Also way to prove my point)
Got a source on that? I love that this rumor goes around every few months and nicely reminds me which communities are full of terrible media literacy.
cox media group “active listening” https://archive.is/pSBzD
What do you think of the discussion here? Do you still believe the sensational headline?
(Also way to prove my point)
the active listening article is very vague and apart from fantasizing about 24/7 surveillance everywhere for everyone it doesn’t say a whole lot directly, so in my mind it’s best to assume the worst case scenario
In other words you choose to believe what you want to believe and don’t care about facts. Neat.
I’ll gladly believe something else if they claim something else, but their claims are very dystopian
@ayyy
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technology/marketing-firm-admits-using-your-own-phone-to-listen-in-on-your-conversations/ar-AA1pVkQW
What do you think of the discussion here? Do you still believe the sensational headline?
(Also way to prove my point)