• LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Seems like a reasonable donation prompt; it’s infrequent, unobtrusive, and can be easily dismissed and disabled. Some people are so sensitive to the idea of any sort of soliciting that they forget projects do need money to function.

    • Leaflet@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yup. I like their just in December approach too. I have a problem with distrohopping so I’m often re-setting up my system. Every time I do, Thunderbird pops up donation prompts both in the app and in my browser. I get why they do it, but it’s annoying when that happens. KDE’s approach avoids this pitfall.

    • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some people just don’t like their OS being used for that purpose and want it to be just a tool that shuts up and does exactly as it’s told and no more. I can see that point of view. Our computers aren’t free billboards. It’s like when car dealers stick their own custom logo on the cars they sell to people.

      • FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The difference is, that you’re using something for free, and you can disable this very easily.

        • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t have a problem with this particular popup, but isn’t that the exact same argument people used to defend Microsoft’s ads? The OS comes with computers for free and you can turn all of those ads off as well.

          I don’t really mind with KDE because they have no real income streams other than donations, but I don’t see why you’re not allowed to be annoyed by notifications like these just because you got stuff for free.

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The Windows is not free. The OEMs pay a license fee and that cost is passed on to people buying those computers.

            • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The OEM also pays for the UEFI firmware and the licenses for the HDMI patents. When it comes to essential software, which Windows is for most customers, the price is included.

              There are devices that optionally come with Windows Pro, and in those cases I can see the price difference making a practical difference.

              • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                “The price is included” so you did pay for it. That alone makes the comparison invalid and its pointless to even compare a free community developed product to a paid product by profit company on a revenue discussions.

          • D_Air1@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Those people are completely misinformed then. The OS did not come free. You paid for it. You pay for the license every time you buy a computer. If KDE had that then yeah it would by annoying, but they probably wouldn’t be asking then.

            Most places tell you how much you are paying for it. I have to go out of my way to not pay for it since I don’t plan on using windows when I buy a new device.