cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13809164

Ignoring the lack of updates if the game is buggy, games back then were also more focused on quality and make gamers replay the game with unlockable features based on skills, not money. I can’t count the number of times I played Metal Gear Solid games over and over to unlock new features playing the hardest difficulty and with handicap features, and also to find Easter eggs. Speaking of Easter eggs, you’d lose a number of hours exploring every nook and cranny finding them!

    • Signtist@bookwyr.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      3 days ago

      Updates, too. Games had to actually be in their final state before they could be sold.

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yea, people wanna act like games of the past didn’t have game breaking glitches and, since no updates, were stuck with working around them.

          Missing No. anyone? PS2 Soul Calibur 3 glitch that wiped your entire Chronicles campaign (and sometimes even the ENTIRE PLAYER FILE) because of how the memory card wrote the data?

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        There are pros and cons, obviously. Getting a game that was extremely well tested and nearly bug free on day 1 was great. But, not all games were that well tested, and many had gameplay-breaking bugs that you just had to live with because there was no way to update them.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is the biggest lie g*mers tell themselves. Unpatched bugs and exploits were more common and were just called DLC expansion packs.

        • MerryJaneDoe@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          DLC expansion packs

          You might not believe this, but there was a time before DLC expansion packs. Super Mario World, I love you.

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Depends on whether standalone expansions are considered DLC. “Oh No, More Lemmings!”, and “Holiday Lemmings”. The Holiday packs are 91’, 92’, 93’, and 94’. I think a strategy guide had extra levels too. Also, the assorted ports of Lemmings sometimes had unique levels.

            If you love Lemmings, I recommend the fan remake, NeoLemmix. It combines all the levels from every platform into a single game, plus with QOL improvements like rewinding by a step. There are also no duplicate levels for difficulty, so every level is unique. Some of the levels have bonus objectives you can go for, if achievements are your thing.

            NeoLemmix CE

            • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I always thought Lemmings would have been cool if they had released a good level editor and let people design their own. Might have turned into something like crossword puzzles where it just became a continuing thing with endless variety.

              • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Alas, the IP is owned by a AAA company. Doomed to languish in the footnotes of history, all because it can’t make all the money. Given TLC, I think Lemmings could have been similar to Worms in longevity.

          • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Lemmings is barely a $1.99 mobile game by today’s standards. It sold at release for 29.99 USD, which is 72 USD in today’s dollars.

            Maybe pick one that makes a decent case for you.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      Games were far better when they didnt update every fucking day. I hate it so much.

      Oh, and I actually OWNED the disc or cart I bought (before online activation shit)

      Thats why i play a lot more ps2 Dreamcast and Xbox now. Fuck (most) modern games.

    • Naho_Zako@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Eh, it really depends on the game. Obviously no game should be dependent on the internet to be playayble, but I do actually like playing against (or with) other people. Mario Kart with NPCs gets boring after a while, and unfortunately bringing friends over to my house to play games wasn’t really an option, so online it was. Splatoon is another one that has always been a delight, and while I love story mode obviously the AI can’t fight like a human.

      I don’t really play shooters and stuff though.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Also consoles had modem peripherals since at least the Famicom days, some of which did allow multiplayer. Namely, there was the Family Computer Network System, however apparently it was an information service with some downloadable content, rather than a multiplayer service.

      Wikipedia says that both Satellaview for SNES and 64DD for N64 had online gaming, but idk how exactly it worked.