Perhaps you could consider starting a personal blog? Maybe it could be a Lemmy community, as people do similar things on Reddit. But, c/science doesn’t seem like the place for such niche topics.
Also I’m not gonna lie I have a hard time understanding things with biology and sometimes I wish I had some help because think of the things we could achieve. The scientific community helping me build ideas beyond our imagination.
It’s not biology. It’s psychology. If you think you can see blue at night in the sky, you have no concept of why the sky is blue, and you need to seek psychological help.
I appreciate your input. To clarify, my perception of the night sky is light grey. I’m open to discussing the science behind these observations, but let’s keep the conversation respectful and focused. If there’s a specific point you’d like to discuss, I’m happy to engage with that.
I understand your perspective on night vision being related to psychology. However, night vision involves both biological and psychological aspects. Biologically, night vision relies on the function of the eyes, specifically the rod cells in the retina that detect low light levels. This physiological process is a key part of biology. On the other hand, how we perceive and interpret what we see in low light conditions involves cognitive processes, which is where psychology comes in. So, while the biological mechanisms are crucial for night vision, the way we experience and understand it also involves psychological factors.
There is no way for anything that uses light to determine color with the absence of spectral light. That is what I’m saying. If you think you’re seeing colors, you’re not.
That’s the thing I for sure am… Yesterday when I took this video that’s published here. I could clearly see the colour on the wall and even see and say how many tapestries are in storage or me describing the colour and pattern on blanket. Wait you should already know this because it was in the video. Though I will 100% bet you. You are unwilling to even hear.
I mean you do realize the moon reflects some light? Though I’m not; I can see how that may break your idea of reality. Also there’s different light spectrums? You sure I’m not seeing a different spectrum.
Ohhh I never really thought of that. Though can I ask why? Isn’t human biology science? Is light waves science? I can understand the basic of what I am using crosses beyond what’s not science. Though what it is activating is.
Uhhhh science, any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general truths or the operations of fundamental laws.
Yeah I was almost certain that wasn’t the definition but here!
unbiased observations and systematic experimentation
Yeah, that’s the crucial part. It’s your own observations about your own self, so you have an inherent bias, and you are not conducting a systematic experiment.
Perhaps you could consider starting a personal blog? Maybe it could be a Lemmy community, as people do similar things on Reddit. But, c/science doesn’t seem like the place for such niche topics.
Also I’m not gonna lie I have a hard time understanding things with biology and sometimes I wish I had some help because think of the things we could achieve. The scientific community helping me build ideas beyond our imagination.
It’s not biology. It’s psychology. If you think you can see blue at night in the sky, you have no concept of why the sky is blue, and you need to seek psychological help.
I appreciate your input. To clarify, my perception of the night sky is light grey. I’m open to discussing the science behind these observations, but let’s keep the conversation respectful and focused. If there’s a specific point you’d like to discuss, I’m happy to engage with that.
I understand your perspective on night vision being related to psychology. However, night vision involves both biological and psychological aspects. Biologically, night vision relies on the function of the eyes, specifically the rod cells in the retina that detect low light levels. This physiological process is a key part of biology. On the other hand, how we perceive and interpret what we see in low light conditions involves cognitive processes, which is where psychology comes in. So, while the biological mechanisms are crucial for night vision, the way we experience and understand it also involves psychological factors.
There is no way for anything that uses light to determine color with the absence of spectral light. That is what I’m saying. If you think you’re seeing colors, you’re not.
That’s the thing I for sure am… Yesterday when I took this video that’s published here. I could clearly see the colour on the wall and even see and say how many tapestries are in storage or me describing the colour and pattern on blanket. Wait you should already know this because it was in the video. Though I will 100% bet you. You are unwilling to even hear.
Light is color, and color is light. Without light, there is no color. You are imagining this and need help.
I mean you do realize the moon reflects some light? Though I’m not; I can see how that may break your idea of reality. Also there’s different light spectrums? You sure I’m not seeing a different spectrum.
Yes, I’m sure. You would be seeing nothing but gray.
Ohhh I never really thought of that. Though can I ask why? Isn’t human biology science? Is light waves science? I can understand the basic of what I am using crosses beyond what’s not science. Though what it is activating is.
Science is data-driven objectivity. Your personal experiences are subjective.
Uhhhh science, any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. In general, a science involves a pursuit of knowledge covering general truths or the operations of fundamental laws.
Yeah I was almost certain that wasn’t the definition but here!
Definition
Yeah, that’s the crucial part. It’s your own observations about your own self, so you have an inherent bias, and you are not conducting a systematic experiment.
I am doing a systemic experimentation since day one lol I’m between step 3&4&5
Then once they finish I can fully create step 6&7
But ykkk most ppl won’t even engage
An inherit bias because I can describe my own body? Otherwise I’m just going with whatever comes.