You’ve got to let the police do their jobs, number one. Number two, you have to do a policy of stop and frisk. When you see a guy coming down the street and you can — the police know every one of them. They know their middle name. They know where they live. They know every one of them, the local police, and they’re great.

You got to let them do their job, stop and frisk, and take their gun away. You’ve got to do it. If somebody has because they have all these guns — you know, it’s very interesting, the toughest gun law, the toughest, by far, in the whole United States is in Chicago, and yet it’s the most — it’s —

Let all your Republican 2Aer friends and family know.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    To the shitheads, these comments are directed at the “right” people. Cops wouldn’t stop and frisk them, they think, because cops know that they’re a law abiding citizen by the color of their skin.

    The joke is that it’s the same damned thing when Eric Adams or Beto ORourke suggests it.

    Take the guns from the poors is always the subtext. You never talk about disarming the police or curtailing access to private security.

    Republicans just want to be vigilantes. And they’re mad at Democrats when they can’t hunt people in their neighborhood for sport.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve talked to a fair number of progressives who are perfectly fine allowing firearms ownership based solely on class and wealth. They too, want “gun control” based on class and wealth.