It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • elephantium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m a dev, and I’m the opposite. At my work, we use main over master. I thought it was a little silly when we first switched, but now I’m used to it. It’s an arbitrary label anyway – could easily use trunk/branch from SVN or release/develop or any number of other labels to keep track of code.

    Hell, we got a new dev on the team a month or two ago, and he tends to name things ‘feat/do-the-thing’ instead of ‘feature/make-it-go’.

    It’s not as big a deal as people online make it out to be.