• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    At what point do you think people should be held accountable for their actions?

    My view is very pragmatic: I believe punishments for crimes should be restorative, for rehabilitation, or act as a deterrent. I don’t see how any of these are met by her going to jail for 18 months.

    I’ve answered your question, so I’ll try mine again: Is it simply about “being held accountable”?

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is. If there is no punishment for getting someone killed, then why would anyone give a shit at their job that involves safety? Airplane mechanics are held responsible for their failures, should we throw that out the window and when they forget to tighten down a bolt that drops a plane just say whelp, better luck next time, lets get George some more training and hope he follows the procedures that are in place to prevent that from ever happening again.

      If there is no consequence, then there is no need for rules and laws.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        First time I downvoted you in this thread because …

        If there is no punishment for getting someone killed, then why would anyone give a shit at their job that involves safety?

        I explicitly covered this by saying noone is going to think “well, I’ll just be careless and bank on cops or prosecutors screwing up the case” so the deterrence factor is still there. Well, if there is someone that dumb, I doubt any deterrence is going to stop them.