The “Big Switch” in the 1960s was North vs South, not White vs Black.
No one is saying black people switched any thing. We are talking about how the Democrats were confederate supporters during the civil war and immediately after, and then there was a switch where the Republicans became the party of confederate supporters. Which is why it’s republicans now who are flying the racist and traitorous confederate flags now, and no longer the democrats.
to steal the executive branch of the government by illegally (at the state level, in defiance of state constitutions and statutes) disenfranchising entire states that vote the way Republicans don’t want
I hate defending the heritage foundation, but my love for reality exceeds that hate.
And they have openly claimed on numerous occasions that they intend to take the executive regardless of what the vote reflects
Of course you don’t link to any of that. But, either way, I’m responding to the blatant lying about what they said right here.
I have no idea what you’re on about, but I’ve got you tagged at some prior point as “blathering idiot,” so I assume you’re just doing what you usually do. Blather on.
If this is any indication of the way you “debate,” I wear that tag as a badge of honor. Thank you.
And this will be the twist around
It’s funny being accused of twisting something around when I’m pointing out that the poster is lying about what was said, and implicitly making calls to violence over that lie.
Bloodless coup quote extracted from a far right YouTube.
Except the poster didn’t say “I heard this on some far right youtube thing” but made a claim about what the head of the heritage foundation said.
The gentleman on display is the president of the heritage foundation, the heritage foundation is heavily involved in writing Project 2025.
And how does that make the lie the top level poster made about what he said any more true? I don’t follow your logic here.
It really depends on how complicated your set up is and how much you value your privacy. I use personal capital (now empower), which also helps me manage a budget as well, and see our multiple investment accounts all in one place, so I can balance both mine and my wife’s. So I would recommend that, with the caveat that you might not feel comfortable sharing all of that with a third party.
You’re right, he didn’t outright say it was a coup, he said it was the second revolution.
In refence to how they were going to reshape the executive after they win the election. Calling it a coup is just outright lying about what was said, as what they claim they are going to do will be perfectly legal. It’s scary enough on it’s own. Trying to paint it as if they are openly claiming they are going to steal the government is just dishonest. Why defend this, I have no idea.
I wouldn’t take that chance.
Not taking the chance isn’t the same as it never happening. Speaking as a decently experienced poker player, you can understand your odds, and make the right call, and still lose because of it. It doesn’t mean you were wrong, it’s just statistics.
They didnt say it was a bloodless coup. They said if they get a Republican elected there will be sweeping changes, akin to another revolution. The statement about the left was a warning that the left might become violent if they try it.
And you’re proving their point pushing for violence.
When one lies about what another has said in an attempt to basically call for violence, it’s incredibly sus.
He was very wrong
If everytimw you say something has a 30% chance of happening, it never happens, then your models are wrong because they should say zero percent. If you say something has a 30% chance of happening and it happens, that doesn’t mean you were wrong.
It’s shocking how many people don’t understand percentages.
Yeah it’s not for everyone, but I just have an event on my calendar for every six months, and I just rebalance when it goes off. Only takes a short while, especially if you are using some tool that will tell you what your weights are.
If you’re really hands off these are a good choice. But if you are willing to rebalance a couple of times a year, it’s unnecessary to pay the extra fees associated with these funds.
I’m going to the first open one 99% of the time. If you don’t want people next to you, make sure you go all the way to the end.
It’s as hilarious as the first time I read it. I think it’s aged quite well. Its almost timeless.
Only non-black racists try to claim that Negro is not a racial slur.
Ive presented straight up facts.
lol. You really have no idea how logically ridiculous you are, do you.
Because you’re more concerned about being “right” than actually changing your viewpoint.
Just remember that you are clearly projecting here. You think I must have this short-coming because you see it in yourself.
I won’t respond any more to any further arguments on your part.
Next time I suggest just moving on rather than taking childish insulting swings at the other person and then running away. I’m happy to debate you on the topic, if you’re willing to not ridiculously and illogically accuse me of being racist because I disagree with you.
It’s been such a steady stream of scary shit coming out about the horse they are backing that they have to manufacture something.
It’s not a word I use myself. I’ve just never considered it offensive, just dated. If someone told me it was offensive to them, I wouldn’t use it (but again, I don’t use it anyway so I don’t see how this wouldn’t come up) around them.
But, honestly, I would have no problem saying “the United Negro College Fund” if I were talking about it, but if there were a similar entity that used the far more offensive n-word in it, I would not feel comfortable using it and wouldn’t say it at all.
And I find this all kind of silly because they freely use it throughout the article, where i doubt the same could be said about the other n-word.
Only non-black racists try to claim that Negro is not a racial slur.
I would have considered your point, but it’s pretty clear you are absolutely unreasonable and presumptuous. Of course you think I’m prejudiced, because it’s a projection of who you are.
You use that term all the time then?
Yes, that’s clearly what I said. You’re very smart.
Removed by mod
Which is mine blowing because they talk so much about the Epstein list, because they believe it confirms their belief about corrupt elites, but then totally reject that the most likely guilty one is trump.
I get your fear, but my optimistic side thinks that trump is special in his ability to self promote to gullible fools. And while the reality denial of trumpism will never completely go away, Republicans will return to some sense of normalcy after he loses his grip.