• GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    6 months ago

    Slightly less than one boob and one testicle. Just like the average person has slightly less than two legs.

        • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s kinda my point. Mastectomies would bring the average down but more women brings it back up. Too lazy to Google but is global # of women who have had mastectomies more or fewer than # of “excess” women (over men)

          • daltotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well are we just equalizing based on boob number, or are we also equalizing based on average boob size? Because some men also have boobs due to hormonal imbalance, and that’s even more if we decide to count like, fat induced moobs for whatever reason. The hormonal imbalances at least would probably bring the average back in favor of slightly more than one boob. If we’ve equalized it to boob size then we’d probably all have like small A cups or something.

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I was thinking about this in terms of limbs, and wondering, since pregnant women have more than 4 limbs, wouldn’t the average number of limbs be greater than 4?

      There are probably considerably more pregnant women than people missing limbs, but then again, the women only have additional limbs for 9 months.