BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square271linkfedilinkarrow-up1393
arrow-up1393imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square271linkfedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·2 years agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?
They don’t exist either.
We agree there