BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agoAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square270fedilinkarrow-up1392
arrow-up1392imageAntinatalism Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square270fedilink
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·4 months agoMy point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
minus-squareretrieval4558@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoAnd how does that relate to angels?
My point is that the whole premise of “consent for existing” is bogus.
And how does that relate to angels?
They don’t exist either.
We agree there