• idunnololz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah but if the proportion of wealth was accurately reflected, we wouldn’t be able to read the speech bubble because the cookies would obstruct it. That is why the artist wisely chose to ensmallen the wealth of the wealthy in this portrayal.

    • KeriKitty (They(/It))@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      a little closer to reality

      Imagining the rest of the enormous pillar of cookies is left to the viewer, I suppose. Hard to show a tower to Mars all in one frame. seethes quietly at wealth hoarders

  • aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    4 months ago

    I prefer the original version with the Rupert Murdoch allusion.

      • homura1650@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because “mate” is an Australian thing. They were probably trying to localize it for a non Australian audience. While still valid, the meme hits differently if the rich person is also a foreigner.

        • Instigate@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          The reference is to Rupert Murdoch; a man who hasn’t been Australian since 1985 when he gave up his Australian Citizenship to become naturalised as an American. He created NewsCorp which became the Fox Corporation; one of the most politically viable and mainstream news sources of the 20th and 21st centuries in the US media landscape.

          The revocation of the word ‘mate’ just honestly shows that Americans are so very alien to the concept of immigrants that even an Anglophonic immigrant who’s been a US citizen for almost 40 years still isn’t somehow ‘American’ if their slang hasn’t been fully naturalised as well.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is highly unrealistic. The working man has a cookie? A whole one? It’s not believable. A fourth of a cookie, maybe.

    • jlow (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, I was thinking the same, the worker would have crumb you’d need a microscope to see and the capitalist would be sitting on a mountain of cookies so big you couldn’t even see him from the ground …

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Old guy needs a larger pile of cookies and to be setting that guy’s house aflame to make more.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    More like: Oh, you want workers rights and a living wage? Meet the scab who is replacing you. He works for less and takes more abuse.

  • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m laughing at this because in my state, a bunch of second generation latino construction workers are upset that Mexican construction workers are doing their jobs. And their solution was to vote for Trump, who would lock them all up in cages.