• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Which cultures? And why do they get to decide what is right and what is wrong?

    Also, naked photos of children are not child porn. Do you think they come out of the womb with clothes on?

    I had to clean shit out of my daughter’s vagina regularly when I changed her diapers. Was that, similarly, sexual assault?

    • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I personally have no use for pictures of baby genitals, but you really do huh? It even makes you upset we want to take away your baby genital pictures huh?

      Is this some perverse form of individualism?

      Edit: if you took a picture of you cleaning your daughters vagina out, and showed someone, yes that would be child porn and child abuse.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Again- they don’t come out of the womb with clothes on. Are parents not supposed to take a picture of their newly-born child or should they put a fig leaf on them?

        I’ve asked several times- if this is child pornography, find me an example of someone getting in legal trouble for having a naked photo of their own baby on their phone. One person.

        • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Were you even in the room with your newborns? Both of mine were moved to a table, cleaned up, and swaddled. I would have had to literally interrupt them to take a genital picture of them.

          But I guess where you live, they pause first and ask if you want a full naked body shot? Cool tradition, I know you love those.

          I’m sure noone has been in trouble for ONLY having their naked child’s pictures on their phone, but I’m sure those pictures have ended up in CP collections. I’m sure you have perfect opsec though so its fine.

          Legality as side, since its not the law preventing me from abusing children anyways, I’m arguing that its morally wrong. Plenty of immoral actions are legal from my perspective.

          Why does your perspective need baby genitals to be featured again?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            No one paused anything. My wife gave my mother-in-law a camera and she took a picture because my wife asked her to. Then we sent that picture to my father and my mother who was on a layover in an airport.

            I assume no one masturbated to it.

            And who is featuring them? Certainly not me. Have I shown them to you? No. And i wouldn’t.

            • Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              And you can say, for certain, that noone has ever seen that photo without your permission? I guess you might have me here if its a physical photo locked in a safe somewhere.

              Edit: although these had to printed at a business, where anyone working could have copied them