• Once the Miserables found themselves outvoted in the Estates General of 1789 by about 3% of the population (the ones with money), it became very uncomfortable in France for aristocrats.

    Just saying,

  • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    You see, this impacts them. Never mind that there’s no actual impact, they only want those among them who behave as expected. Also, he got excessive attention due to his attire, which gave him a bigger audience for his political views.

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Formal dress codes are upper class by aesthetics. Its just another little bite of compliance that one is expected to take before joining those in power.

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Looking presentable is a priority no? I mean they’re not dressed like British barristers, but I also think showing up to a legislature in a hoodie and shorts is trashy

  • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Look, I’m all for raising the minimum wage, and if it ever comes across the ballot I would always vote yes. But this is such a shit take, of fucking course dress code is easier to deal with than the economics of the whole country. If you’re going to critique the government, make sense at least.

  • cricket97@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    Would love to see some bipartisan support for banning congress members from trading stocks. Both sides are doing it to such a degree that they are more likely to be replaced before any legislation regarding this gets passed. Obligatory Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker link: https://twitter.com/PelosiTracker_/