Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square240fedilinkarrow-up1735file-text
arrow-up1735imageWho needs stable, feature-rich desktops anywaydiscuss.tchncs.deNatanox@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square240fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLittux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 hours agoI went from GNOME on Ubuntu, to KDE on Manjaro, to XFCE on Manjaro, and finally i3 on Arch. GNOME was sluggish and not customisable. KDE had graphical glitches everywhere that made navigating interfaces annoying sometimes On XFCE, I actually didn’t find that many issues. I just stopped using Manjaro and switched to i3 when doing so.
minus-squaremake -j8@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 hours agoi also tried i3 at some point, it was pretty cool, but i prefer more “standard”/“no tweaking” approach, so xfce wins on that one. i did install KDE ob my second (framework) laptop, but i kinda hate it lol. Never tried “Gnome”
xfce rules
I went from GNOME on Ubuntu, to KDE on Manjaro, to XFCE on Manjaro, and finally i3 on Arch.
GNOME was sluggish and not customisable.
KDE had graphical glitches everywhere that made navigating interfaces annoying sometimes
On XFCE, I actually didn’t find that many issues. I just stopped using Manjaro and switched to i3 when doing so.
i also tried i3 at some point, it was pretty cool, but i prefer more “standard”/“no tweaking” approach, so xfce wins on that one. i did install KDE ob my second (framework) laptop, but i kinda hate it lol. Never tried “Gnome”