It is about the Hasbara talking point “Israel had the right to defend itself.” Nothing else. Bernie needs to stop inserting Hasbara disclaimers to both sides a genocide.
You’re so fucking insane with this talking point bullshit. What bernie said is a sentence that stands alone, not everyone is some loser slurping media 24/7 and declaring literal fucking plain english as some uniquely constructed sentence with an exact connotation.
“Israel has the right to defend itself” is the number one excuse used by Israel to commit genocide and the catchphrase Zionists insert in front of every single crime.
The video is a selective edit of a whole sentence that has been manipulated to make a popular politician say something despicable. If you add in the second half of his sentence then we can have an honest discussion. Until then, you have selectively edited the truth to spread a lie.
Did you edit it to be that short before the sentence was complete creating the false narrative or did someone do that for you? If you did it yourself, can you explain why you edited it to be intentionally deceptive when Sanders was communicating the exact opposite idea from your claim?
It is about the Hasbara talking point “Israel had the right to defend itself.” Nothing else. Bernie needs to stop inserting Hasbara disclaimers to both sides a genocide.
You’re so fucking insane with this talking point bullshit. What bernie said is a sentence that stands alone, not everyone is some loser slurping media 24/7 and declaring literal fucking plain english as some uniquely constructed sentence with an exact connotation.
“Israel has the right to defend itself” is the number one excuse used by Israel to commit genocide and the catchphrase Zionists insert in front of every single crime.
You should ask yourself why the UN rapporteur specifically addressed this point. https://youtube.com/shorts/ApnKGxawGfE
Person: “My opponent said ‘X’. Here’s why ‘X’ is wrong.”
You: “You need to stop saying X, Person!”
Person: ignores argument and tries to talk about something else
You: “We need change the topic because you are right but this post is inconvenient to my narrative”
I’m sorry, I actually can’t follow. Who ignored what argument? Where did I change the topic from what to what?
Go watch the video I linked first.
The video is a selective edit of a whole sentence that has been manipulated to make a popular politician say something despicable. If you add in the second half of his sentence then we can have an honest discussion. Until then, you have selectively edited the truth to spread a lie.
This video I just linked.
https://youtube.com/shorts/ApnKGxawGfE
Did you edit it to be that short before the sentence was complete creating the false narrative or did someone do that for you? If you did it yourself, can you explain why you edited it to be intentionally deceptive when Sanders was communicating the exact opposite idea from your claim?
https://youtube.com/shorts/ApnKGxawGfE
Attack the idea and not the person.
deleted by creator