tripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish · 10 months agoYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.caimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1823
arrow-up1823imageYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.catripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·10 months agoI hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
minus-squarefederal reverse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·10 months agoIt’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-210 months agoI know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
minus-squarefederal reverse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 months agoBe that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months agoIt’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.
minus-squareForeverComical@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months agoWas about to do that, saved me the crop thanks
I hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
It’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
I know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
Be that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
It’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.
Perfection
Was about to do that, saved me the crop thanks