Yes. I don’t know the correct English terminology for that though. Before the company goes bankrupt the court may force the company to being working under outside supervision with rather wide powers. Not caring about what owners or workers think about it. Literal fascism. The idea is that all sides are interested to company to live. And if nothing helps then it will just continue with bankruptcy. Nobody loses much.
so you think fascism is laws and contracts? dude. fascism is violence and chaos. in your analogy, fascism wouldn’t be the bank foreclosing because of a failure to pay, it would be the factory owner putting his son in charge and telling him to burn the place down so that the payment records for his majority minority workforce are destroyed and he can deny not paying them
I’m sorry, but outside of Singapore, do you have any single example?
Because well, “it worked this one time on the entire history of the world” isn’t the flex you seem to think it is.
Singapore was not fascism.
It is more closely related to authoritarian socialism.
Authoritarian capitalism with welfare and competent management
Yes. I don’t know the correct English terminology for that though. Before the company goes bankrupt the court may force the company to being working under outside supervision with rather wide powers. Not caring about what owners or workers think about it. Literal fascism. The idea is that all sides are interested to company to live. And if nothing helps then it will just continue with bankruptcy. Nobody loses much.
That’s not even close to fascism.
so you think fascism is laws and contracts? dude. fascism is violence and chaos. in your analogy, fascism wouldn’t be the bank foreclosing because of a failure to pay, it would be the factory owner putting his son in charge and telling him to burn the place down so that the payment records for his majority minority workforce are destroyed and he can deny not paying them
You have a really odd definition of fascism.