Every time I go to the piefed frontpage I’m blown away by how much more polished it is. It has all the bells and whistles that lemmy is sometimes missing.

Whats the catch? Why aren’t we recommending everyone goes to piefed instead of lemmy?

App support is one thing I can think of.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Sure but does the rate of growth matter? The post asks about recommending Piefed instead of Lemmy. I presume the point is that the number of Piefed users would grow if we did that. So whether a thread produces 10, 1000, or 10000 users in a day, the number of users would grow over time. Then I think the question remains, if my Piefed instance costs $10/mo to run today, would it cost $100 with 10000 users or $1000, or more, or less?

    Relevant

    • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The rate of growth does matter yea. If an instance gets worried, they can lock signups. Slow growth means the software has time to improve as they notice issues.

      Lemmy had many issues scaling before, except Lemmy had huge surges with the Reddit API blackouts.

      If people start recommending PieFed now, it’s on their own terms instead of a massive wave. They can backoff if they get too many users.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, that makes sense for the defect class of performance problems. I’m more concerned with the inherent performance (compute) disadvantages of Python. Perhaps they wouldn’t matter, hard to know without load testing.

        I didn’t downvote.

        • Snoopy@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Well, i thought the same about rust and python. i’m not a dev and lack understanding on their component.

          My opinion became more nuanced with Lemmy. I have read there spike in ressource usage with lemmy on server.

          So, I believe the language matter but also its features, the way you think how people will use it. Its core design.

          When you manage a social network, the most fondamental feature is the moderation board. I find this area is lacking on Lemmy. Crosspost ? Duplicate everywhere, on my timeline, i get 4-5 time the same post…so i believe it miss some design thinking.

          From what i see, the various lemmy-bot (most of them are written in python i think ?) and alternative frontend are improving lemmy experience. For example, how do you add an mod with lemmy-web-ui ?

          I also believe that being written in Rust make it harder for new devs to help. But in later time we will see a change.

          I’m not sure if it answer part of your question, but there are area where lemmy can improve : https://join.piefed.social/2024/02/09/comparing-network-utilization-of-lemmy-kbin-and-piefed/