• jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      14 days ago

      Correct, but this would only impact the species that bite humans.

      Amazing resource here with a ton of info I did not know:

      https://www.livescience.com/what-if-all-mosquitoes-died

      To your point, yes:

      “mosquitoes are a primary food source for numerous animals, including bats, birds, frogs, fish and dragonflies, it’s likely there would be at least some ecological impacts, at least in the short term. Dragonflies, for example, are often known as mosquito hawks, owing to their ability to eat as many as 100 mosquitoes in a single day. It’s likely they, as well as a host of other critters, would, at the very least, have to change their diets somewhat.”

      To the larger point:

      “There are around 3,500 mosquito species, but ‘only around 100 will potentially bite and spread disease to humans,’”

      So we eliminate the 100 species that bite humans, that still leaves 3,400 species for the bats, birds, frogs, and dragonflies.

      In fact, it may not even be necessary to completely elimimate the 100 species that bite humans, kill enough of the biters, and they may evolve into a species that just doesn’t bite us.

      • Null User Object@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        kill enough of the biters, and they may evolve into a species that just doesn’t bite us.

        Or they evolve into a species that still bites us but is unaffected by this drug. Bonus feature: the new species is also a prime carrier for Ebola, or something.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      when the us triples their efforts to increase global warming only rats, removedroaches, mosquitoes, the worst types of flies, and other pests will survive and anything that eats them will die off.