• rektdeckard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 months ago

      If your delicate sensibilities can’t handle reading this, imagine how these prisoners feel. This SHOULD shock you, and maybe that shock will motivate you to action against it.

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Please do to assume my implication or non implication to this cause or another one. And properly warn for rape content.

        • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’m not OP, and it’s literally in the title. Be an adult.

          EDIT: I obviously don’t understand what the issue even is, because you just said rape. Is the word okay for comments but not titles? Or is the problem that you don’t have the reading comprehension skills to read the word in the title and infer the nature of the content behind the link?

            • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              I am truly sorry if I hurt any feelings. I honestly was not aware that we as a society decided that using that word is insensitive. I (34M) was sexually assaulted when I was 8, FWIW, and I understand that words have power. I just didn’t get the memo in this case.

              What is the considerate way to title this post?

              • daltotron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Generally people would call it sexual assault, or shorten it to SA sometimes, just as is the case for CP or CSAM.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree when it comes to the average person, but there should still be warnings for people who’ve been raped so they’re aware.

        • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          You just said the word tho

          EDIT: sorry, not trying to be snarky. You’re right, but your misstep points out the problem

          • efstajas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            We’re in a thread about rape, I think it’s pretty clear not every comment in here needs a content warning.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Fair enough I suppose. I was talking to you about the general concept of warnings and such for sexual assault, and wasn’t considering a broader audience.

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I shouldn’t have ask for CW but for NSFW. I’m grow up enough to know you don’t throw at people explicite depictions of violence before make sure they consent.
        I really don’t get what is upsetting about my comment.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          A snippet of text from the NYT will never be “NSFW”.

          I really don’t get what is upsetting about my comment.

          I think the fact that presumably grown-ass adults need content warnings (other than NSFW which, if clicked at work might get them in trouble) is embarrassing.

          This expectation that the world will change around you to coddle you should be dispensed with. Hence, the “grow up” comment.