• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Meanwhile, in reality, they are terrified of letting Puerto Rico become a state because it might threaten their delicate gerrymandered hegemony in Congress by adding two more senators and one or more representatives. This “map” is the fever dream of a lead-poisoned, terminally MAGA moron.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I love how even unconsciously they can’t take Mexico. I know it’s most probably racism, but we still prevail prior to come back.

      • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not joking. The USA can take Mexico anytime, but they hardly could keep it. Also, the USA does not rule in Mexico, at least not openly. If you take that USA meddling in other countries affairs is enough to call it a colony, well, then everyone in the world is a colony of the USA. NAFTA was a trade agreement, but it was contingent to whatever is agreed between governments, not whatever the US government says. The renegotiation of NAFTA, the USMCA, is proof of this. If the USA government thinks countries in the world do not have options to trade, it’s their mistake. At this point they can be replaced, but that doesn’t help anybody in North America.

        • Corn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          If the USA government thinks countries in the world do not have options to trade, it’s their mistake

          Any country that is not prepared to get the Venezuala/Cuba/Iran/Russia/North Korea treatment will do what the US tells it.

    • Corn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Putin is not a tankie; the dude is a literal billionaire who participated in gutting the USSR. How well did the haute bourgeosie fare under Lenin or Mao?

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Perhaps he wasn’t a stalinist around the time of USSR’s deflation but he sure is like Stalin reincarnated today. And seeing as we are in lemmy, I need the feel to remind everyone that that is an extremely bad thing to be.

        • Corn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Stalin was a communist revolutionary who played an integral role in the creation of the USSR. Putin is a liberal counterrevolutionary, who is partly responsible for hypercapitalist modern Russia, the two are not comparable at all.

          If by “he sure is like stalin”, you mean he employs violence to maintain and consolidate power, that’s every state ever, that’s kinda how states work.

        • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve had multiple conversations with people here on Lemmy who seem to be under the impression that Stalin was a great dude who really just wanted to best for everyone, freedom and riches!

          This is the point where you’re an extremist without knowing that you’re an extremist

          • Corn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Being an extremist means having any more nuanced view than “stalin just loved doing evil things for absolutely no reason”