House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration’s authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

  • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The problem is you get the NDP/Liberal vs. Conservative effect when you do this. If you have 30% of the population vote for your Leftie, and 30% vote for the other Leftie, in a given congressional district, the Republican can win with 31%, despite 60% voting against the Republican. We need RCV before we can do this, and people need to understand that they MUST put the other party as choice 2 or we are back to ending up with a Republican.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I fail to see your point. That sounds like you have a 61 majority for the Republicans. The “Liberals” are aiding the Republicans getting power, as the article points out.

      Also the Democrats are a pink washed far right party, by standards outsidr the US.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If Democrats are so scared of splitting the vote, they don’t need to run a candidate. It’s not like they’re particularly interested in winning anyway.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This is why a new party needs to be built from the ground up, starting with local races that are uncontested or use ranked choice voting already.

    • ofcourse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      That is indeed a problem that needs to be resolved, and likely through ranked choice voting. But as a country, we tend to focus too much on the presidential election. Change will have to start in the congressional elections - both at federal and state levels. The issue of votes splitting will be a lesser issue in these elections except in a few large districts. That will also be where smaller fundraising campaigns would go further.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Change starts at the dog catcher. That’s how the maga morons did it. They ran for every single down ballot race, all the way to the bottom.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They just need to put the Trump party last (or whatever the shittiest party is at the time)… They can put anyone they want 2nd