• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

    They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

    Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there’s no way they’re getting 38 States to agree to that.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think the law is a restricting factor for the trump regime.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump is the candidate during next election

      Red States let him be an option even though they shouldn’t

      He wins enough red States to have a majority

      They name him president even though it’s against the Constitution

      The supreme Court is packed with his picks so they don’t do anything about it

      Tada! Civil war? Dissolution of the USA? Who knows!?!

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        This.

        We need to stop acting like the norms matter at all, like the rules still apply. We must treat this like what it is: a threat to our very survival.

        The US government, at least the parts that actually could do something about this, are on the brink of total collapse or dismantlement. I hate to say it but I think the time for peaceful resistance is long since past, i don’t see any way this is going to end without bloodshed

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      Trump is ruling by executive order and no one is stopping him from doing any of it, constitutional or not.
      He’ll just issue an executive order to lower the threshold and at best that order gets challenged and goes to the SCOTUS, and we all know what will happen there.

      • drekloge@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only effective short-term roadblocks are going to be legal challenges, like the ones WA’s governor and AG have been preparing for. You’re right that this only works until it gets overturned by SCOTUS, and it doubly hurts progressives because we now have to spend resources (time and money) fighting nonsense instead of fighting for causes we want…like some goddamn healthcare.

        Delay. Deny. Depose.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        There’s already an injunction against one of his orders. I’m sure more will come.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s obviously completely performative, this is a very common move in US politics in general, I’ve noticed–introducing a bill they know is definitely not going to pass, but makes them look good to their base.