In my eyes, news outlets like for example ProPublica had started to lose respect, because they still use Twitter like nothing ever happened.

Why they don’t leave like what The Guardian did or like the other news outlets?

Are they too corporate internally to leave Twitter?

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I would guess it’s because there are no other alternatives to X that are as big and as popular.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Mastodon, the alternative I hoped took off, has a confusing onboarding process for non-techies. But Bluesky’s is not confusing at all, it’s as good as Twitter’s ever was

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            I don’t disagree but they need something to make it more attractive to new users. The only person I talked into making an account got confused selecting a server…but I’ve gotten a half dozen people on bluesky with no handholding

        • hisao@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It got a bit more popularity over the last half of year. Not as big as X, but not small AF and it’s the best “easy” alternative. The best “hard” alternative is mastodon, what makes it “hard” is it’s very fragmented and it takes some efforts to pick instance, to understand consequences of your choice, and to figure out how to use your feed for different scenarios.