• qantravon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      I know someone who had to do this. Her parents were abusive and were refusing to do the FASFA paperwork, holding it over her head for something. She had already been in college a couple of years at this point. So, she found a friend she trusted and they got married, allowing her to get the funding she needed to continue to attend college.

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        My girlfriend was in a similar situation. The people at FASFA will work with you if you can prove that your parents will not comply and you aren’t financially dependent on them. As long as your friend wasn’t living with her parents, she likely didn’t have to get married.

    • BigLime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m fr curious if this can work. If it does, it seems beyond impossible to find a 25 year old college woman who would even want to marry

        • Asetru@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          “Hey, let’s just get married to be eligible for benefits. Yeah, we’ll just pinky promise that we won’t ever abuse the hell out of our ‘partner’ who we now share every single responsibility with. I also took out a huge loan to buy a boat, why are you asking, dear? Half of it is technically yours, why aren’t you happy?”

            • MNByChoice@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Legally it is a shortcut to establishment of a number of implied contracts, tells the courts how to unwind those contracts, and rights. In some cases the implied contracts are more effective than written ones. Medical decisions and visitation rights being first ones I can think of.

              I sm not a lawyer.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Two people bound together for life for the purposes of creating a family

              • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Yeah, you can miss me with the religious bullshit. This is a legal loophole in a legal system.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”

                  • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Then what is your basis for it only being between two people? You’re defining it just like religion does because that’s where you got the idea even if you don’t realize it.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Only as a last resort. You shouldn’t get married without intending to stay together for life.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a “man and a woman”

                  Also, if it’s more than two, that’s not a marriage; that’s a group chat.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                “You shouldn’t use marriage to stop yourself being legally chained to your parents. The purpose of marriage is to legally chain you to your spouse.”

                If people could “divorce” their parents you wouldn’t have to worry about this.

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You’re thinking about this all wrong. The age of marriage and childbearing have been going up. Think of the kids who would just decide fuck it might as well just stay married and do this. This could be the arranged marriage of the future.