The government claims a monopoly on violence and the violence of the government is supposed to be well regulated and democratically legitimated.
However this only works, if there is actual checks and balances and the question whether people are held accountable to their crimes does not depend on their income, net worth or connections.
censorship, not moderation. and of course free speech only applies to enabling racism and such
I mean free speech actually only applies to government, not social media.
Removed by mod
The government claims a monopoly on violence and the violence of the government is supposed to be well regulated and democratically legitimated.
However this only works, if there is actual checks and balances and the question whether people are held accountable to their crimes does not depend on their income, net worth or connections.
You censor via moderation though right?