

One of my favorite modern SCOTUS rulings (not that there are many I like these days) was written by Neil Gorsuch of all people in Bostock v. Clayton County. It basically ruled that discrimination by sexual orientation and gender identity is inseparable from discrimination by sex. Presumably, there are behaviors you’d expect and accept by straight, cisgender people. When those same behaviors are done by a gay/trans person, the only difference is their biological sex. If you don’t accept that behavior on that basis, it’s discrimination by sex, plain and simple.
That said, the laws on discrimination by sex does have some nuance to it. I may be a little off on some details here, but it’s not enough to say that men have to do one thing and women another, there needs to be (for example) a difference in tangible benefit like pay.
But I also can’t imagine there wouldn’t be some kind of harassment claim if a company were to misgender a cisgender person, and with the precedent set in that pretty recent ruling, it shouldn’t be too difficult of a claim to make… I hope.










Supposedly that’s Bari’s reason for spiking it. Still, the firsthand account from the people detained isn’t very common, and it’s uniquely telling that the government is citing criminal acts for which the guy pleaded out of and is legally innocent over.