

Have fun gooning rightoid 🐑


Have fun gooning rightoid 🐑


Nope I don’t believe you 🐑


Ah so all the games you were told by “influencers” to hate. Got it 🐑


FYI: for those who have been using archive.today/archive.is/archive.ph for paywall evasion and archiving articles for posterity.
Apparently the operator of this archiving service has been using the service for targeted harassment (both technical via DDOS, and social via doxxing) of someone. Wikipedia, which was also a heavy user of the service, has decided to move away from the service and is trying to plan out how to do so (it has been used for hundreds of thousands of references).
Posting mostly for awareness about the DDOS part… basically it means every time you visit the service your computer is used to send connection requests to the recipient of the harassment, slowing their computers to a crawl and making them unable to host content, effectively silencing them online. So, no one should click on or use any links from this service.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2026-03-10/Technology_report


Context?
An actual answer for the browser instead of just shitting on Brave would be IronFox (hardened Firefox), and the best place to get it would be the Accrescent app store.
But for real don’t use Brave…


But you see they can sell this! Can’t sell “fallow fields”…
Exactly. At the federal level the U.S. is an oligarchy completely controlled by the Epstein class.
The approver of the pull request does…


Graphene isn’t a ROM, it is a standalone mobile OS based on the Android Open Source Project. So yes, Google primarily develops it, and has de-facto control. But Graphene is actively working to change that, especially with partnering with OEMs so that they can increase device driver support and give more devs incentive to work on AOSP/Graphene in general. For mobile devices the device drivers are huge, unlike desktop/server linux where MOST (obviously not all) things work.


Is it wrong to call out those complying in advance with fascism? I will agitate in any way that sparks debate and encourages people to be more aware of what is at stake. I gain absolutely nothing else, especially on Lemmy… maybe if this was Reddit you could accuse me of being some shill farming karma. But that shit culture doesn’t exist here.


Yes, the PR specifically calls out the laws as the reason for this change. The problem is BOTH the laws getting passed, and corporate interests complying in advance.


Through this conversation I learned SixOS (systemd-less NixOS) exists


If the whole story was the addition of this change with no other context, I’d agree. But if you read the PR description you’ll see its more than that. The laws in question are specifically called out. This suggests that whether or not the legal interpretation of compliance changes (the law could require more than just DOB entry, aka DOB verification with government ID), systemd is planning to comply rather than join the legal battle against these invasive requirements.


Gonna be real with you, I’m not running a password checker tool over unencrypted http. Is this vibe coded?


Seems like a horrible eagerness to comply in advance with equally horrible US state laws when this legal scenario is not even close to resolved.


Exactly. This is a massive overreach, and it is crazy that Poettering is even considering merging this.
Goddamnit