Is the controversy because they’re having sex in the hospital?
We watched an educational movie from the 1950s by Frank Capra, which my 8th grade science teacher had liked as a kid. He admitted they were somewhat dated, but still basically accurate.
In it, the scientist explained that they still don’t understand how chloroplasts transform sunlight into energy. The cartoon chloroplast hid what she was doing and said something like, “The Russians don’t know either.”
I was pretty blown away by a scientist admitting they didn’t know something, at that age, but when I looked it up, I discovered that scientists had pretty much figured it out, but it’s very complicated.
Clip if you’re interested: https://archive.org/details/our_mr_sun around 36:09
Whoa, til
I was in college when I learned Columbus thought it was pear shaped, as opposed to the globe idea that was most popular (and true). He though the northern hemisphere was smaller than the southern which is why he expected to sail to India in a relatively short distance.
There have been some very long lived hoaxes on Wikipedia, but they’re basically the exception that proves the rule. Nothing is infallible.
This is just semantics. Companies are often called services because they operate and maintain the network of service to your house, whether it’s electric fields moving around, gas particles, laundry pick up and delivery, trash and recycling, milk, newspaper delivery, Internet service, cable subscription, whatever else. Perfectly reasonable to call home electricity a service operated by your utility.
Some species don’t grow very well in agricultural settings – especially forest products.
If you harvest too much from public property, then you’re breaking the law.
Maybe people will figure out how to farm it, which would probably lower the price enough so that people stop poaching it.
It’s true they really don’t cross the Atlantic all that well but they’re great fresh
The problem using AI like you would try to use a search engine. When people write books or make videos or art, you as a consumer can evaluate them critically – what is their point of view? What are their biases? Can they be trusted?
Gen AI is a tool that always answers with confidence, and the makers and/or hosters of the tool have a responsibility to keep people from using it to do harm. 404 media has written all kinds of articles about how people have used it in harmful ways – making abusive images of people, or impersonating stalking victims, or filtering out resumes that don’t match the pattern of a college-educated white boy without explicitly saying it, and all kinds of stuff like that. As a society we have to protect the most vulnerable and hold these companies accountable for what they enable people to do with their products.
If you self-host an open tool and have control over it, you assume that responsibility.
Is it against the law to burn the Koran in Manchester, or were there other laws broken as well?
Don’t give up that easily. There are many many federal courts, and the Supreme Court can only take so many cases a year.
Things are dire but we can’t just let it happen, we must demand rule of law, and make fun of all the stuff their lawyers do pretending to be legal.
The county didn’t want an autocratic government consolidating power, even though that’s who many people voted for. There is a power struggle happening and we need to support everybody who gets in their way.
One small nitpick, it’s called National airport, or Reagan National if you have to. Never Reagan by itself.
Old enough to vote in cat elections or human ones?
an LLM uses an equally authoritative writing style when regurgitating things it has trained on millions of times (things completely accepted as fact) as when regurgitating things it has only trained on once (lies, sarcasm).
I never knew that and it explains a lot.
Great solution (esp the corrected one further down). I can relate to OP in the sense that if I studied programming, I might be able to whip something like this up, but so far I haven’t been disciplined enough to learn and practice programming consistently.
It’s also interesting, this new AI variation of Cunningham’s Law, wherein posting an incorrect solution on a discussion board will yield way more attention and correct answers than asking a question. It’s interesting to wonder why that is.
If it’s correct can you post it here
I’ve been watching YouTube about actual pilots, and one fun thing is the Autopilot is often better than the human in the mechanics of steering the plane in stable conditions, but it can’t really do anything else, so it’s designed to turn itself off with an alarm whenever it encounters a situation it can’t handle.
I guess that’s because it’s an old school program with error handling, etc, where all generative AI is used in such wider scopes it can’t be realistically programmed to say “I can’t do this” because its limitations are so poorly defined?
What’s wrong will tall buildings?