![](https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/15119f46-49e3-49a6-b60f-3260b6785d43.webp)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5170ed37-415d-42be-a3e7-3edd79eda681.png)
The statement is completely age dependent. Not too long ago(before the movie), it was pretty newsworthy any time the next group reported that they were trying to find it.
The statement is completely age dependent. Not too long ago(before the movie), it was pretty newsworthy any time the next group reported that they were trying to find it.
And if that’s the case, your comment means nothing.
That’s not very socialist of you.
The majority of men showed changes in behavior before the suicide, especially social withdrawal,
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488060/
AOL chatrooms
No alts, just some orphaned accounts from moving to new instances.
Good for you.
Inb4 “They already do that based on what you regularly purchase”
It’s never enough data for them.
The only good target. I’m glad he was too incompetent to take anyone else with him.
Would be more aptly named the suicidedozer.
This was incredibly informational, thank you.
We are not rational actors; humans do incredibly illogical and irrational things all of the time. Many of the popular models championed by supporters of neoliberal capitalism completely fail to account for this, instead, assuming rational self-interest.
I think this has made more sense to me than anything else I’ve read so far as of late. If I am understanding it correctly, Capitalism is sold under the guise that companies will only prioritize profit to the point at which it begins to harm some part of society but no further because we all know that would be bad and we’re not bad people when in reality there are bad people that are ok with doing exactly that.
This seems to me like less of an oversight and more of a “we, as tobacco CEOs do not believe that smoking is addictive”, right? The masses may believe differently but those at the top of these systems, companies and law making entities have to know that what they’re doing is putting profit over humans. Were Europeans any better at implementing Capitalism before or is the system impossible or nearly so to protect against this?
That’s an incredibly accurate way of describing what looking at dating today feels like.
I definitely was due to ignorance, it was not intentional.
That being said, the economic system in place is always at the mercy of those in political power, is it not? I’m not being fecicious, it just seems to me that no matter the conomic system in place, human nature seems to be to find a way to exploit it. I just can’t think of a scenario where that can be protected against.
However, instead of the market naturally transitioning to these cheaper and cleaner energy sources, fossil fuel companies are leveraging their enormous political influence to hinder this shift. They employ tactics such as lobbying, spreading disinformation, and funding politicians who support fossil fuels, all in an effort to maintain their dominance and profits in the energy market.
Which lets you know we don’t live in a democracy. This is the definition of an oligarchy.
I guess what I mean is that it seems like it’s the entities in power and not the political system is what’s causing these atrocities. I imagine they could do just as well if you told them today that they’re doing it under a socialist umbrella. I’ll try to give the linked book a read.
Is there something unbreakable in socialism that keeps it from being exploitable?
Im surprised that some may consider this fact little-known. The privatisation and exploitation of housing convicts has been discussed for decades. Everything from outrageous phone fees to slave labor, it’s been happening in plain sight for a very long time.
I love it as well, just thought alt or indie was too much a stretch for this one.
Can the song really be called “indy” or “alt” if it topped the Billboard Modern Rock Tracks chart?
It sank in 1912. Length of time is relative.