I don’t get what this statement is getting at in relation to the above post?
I don’t get what this statement is getting at in relation to the above post?
Cheers! Half of the time I understand jokes every time.
This is what happens the other 50%.
Is that an intentional bread pun? I’m not getting the relation.
Title feels like clickbait. Would be more convinced it was deliberate clickbait if the thumbnail didn’t directly show the sign saying “negro” and not the actual slur.
But that just makes the choice of title more confusing.
Ah, kph/“kills per hour”. My favorite American unit of speed.
Perhaps you could say that if you arbitrarily remove any nuance or qualifications at all from the statement.
A reasonable person would see a message advising women to hide who they vote for from their signficant others and question why they (Harris’s advisors) thought the message would land. And what that says about the people those women are married to.
They’ll unleash such violent violence that women’s voice won’t ever again.
Made significantly more difficult because the American president is the one doing the asking.
No need for (a). That’s barely a cover and certainly not part of his racist mathematics.
Talibangelical cats. Like Rumtumtugger, Mr. Mistoffelees, and the Nefarious Netanyahu.
I imagine the difference is a between “why” and “why not”.
A generally educated couple might encounter the question of “Is there I reason why I should have kids?”, decide “yes, because I’d like to”, and have 1-3 kids. More poorly educated couples encounter the question “is there a reason why I should not have kids?”, decide “no”, and have 2-3 more.
I mean, that is just a sci-fi concept. Ecumenopolis.
You’re lucky if the game has reasonable climate progression like this. Most games the frozen zone is right next to forest zone which is right next to the volcano zone.
“Maudlin” is a word that comes to mind.
A melondick is not the kinda dick you want
Their own citizens, I’d assume
I don’t recall the full episode but a few things stood out.
Corrupt officials can (theoretically) be ousted if the corruption comes to light. Spending more money to influence dopes to duly elect someone who will legislate against the dopes’ best interests is watertight.
Did Russia promise to back them on this thing if they send people in the meat grinder small military operation against Ukraine?
Or is it just that time of the month again?
I don’ t get this. Why promise something you are sure you can’t commit to? Why desire for a politician to lie to you?? Politicians are already dragged for false promises on things they’ve actually tried (but failed) to accomplish. But you want them to whisper sweet nothings in your ear about an incredibly politically-complex issue…for what? I don’t want her to say it unless she means to do it.